Report: Adverse Events Section for Covid Vaccine Removed from CDC Website

In a seemingly predictable turn of events… important government info is getting shuffled around.

Surprised?

From the Daily Wire:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website appeared to have quietly stopped collecting COVID-19 vaccine adverse events on the federal agency’s V-safe website earlier this summer.

“Thank you for your participation. Data collection for COVID-19 vaccines concluded on June 30, 2023,” the V-safe website reads.

Instead of displaying data collected from the mRNA vaccine, the CDC website redirects users to the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) website for adverse event reporting.

Dr. David Gortler, a Brownstone Institute Fellow who formerly served as a senior official and advisor for the FDA, first reported the change in the CDC’s website, questioning why the federal agency removed the data.

“Does this mean that the CDC believes that the mRNA Covid-19 injections are so safe, there is no need to monitor adverse event reports any longer?” he wrote. “What is the argument against continued monitoring, especially since the V-safe website was already up and paid for?”

Since mRNA injections hit the market in 2021, Gortler cited the FDA’s VAERS database that allegedly names the vaccines as the number one cause of more than 1.5 million adverse event reports, including heart attacks and cases of myocarditis and pericarditis in the U.S.

Gortler also cited an FDA-funded study out of Harvard that states VAERS reports represent less than 1 percent of vaccine adverse events that actually occur.

Before the CDC removed the database, Gortler shared an image from the V-safe Covid Vaccine Adverse Health Impacts dashboard that stated over 6.4 million individuals were impacted out of 10.1 million users, including roughly 2 million who were “unable to conduct normal activities of daily living or needing medical care,” Gortler wrote.

“Will the CDC opine on the existing data or justify its halting of collecting new safety data?” he wrote. “To the best of my knowledge, stopping the collection of public health information doesn’t have a clinical justification or scientific precedence — especially when it comes to an actively marketed product.”

Gortler’s findings come amid rumors that Transportation Security Administration (TSA) managers were recently instructed that pandemic-era restrictions, including mask-wearing for travelers and COVID-19 lockdowns, would return to the U.S. before 2024. But officials reportedly told The Associated Press such reports were “utterly false” and that they never received such information.

It almost looks like… they’re trying to sweep something under the rug. Hmm… that couldn’t be it, though, right? They would never try to hide anything that makes them look bad, would they?

To be completely honest… I’m surprised that they not only had a section on this at all, but that it also took them this long to move it somewhere else. I guess they had to play the game for long enough so as not to appear as if they didn’t give a rat’s a$$. Whether they actually did is pretty clear to people who have two braincells.

There can never be any real admission of guilt or wrongdoing on the overarching issue, though. Society as we know it would fall in on itself.

So… that means everyone has to pretend that not only did everything work out ok, but we should all be thanking these people for saving the planet. That’ll happen over my dead, jabless body…

We have to think about this in terms of the future. We know what’s happening, but your grandchildren won’t. The future citizens of this country (if there still is one) will have forgiven and forgotten because the record will read very differently than how the subjects of the event remember it.

That’s most of the historical record since the beginning of time, but it stings a little more when it happens to you, doesn’t it?