

The Fulton County, Georgia grand jury has made their decision on whether or not they believe Trump and others interfered in Georgia’s electoral process during the 2020 president election. Instead of keeping her mouth shut until the case was over, foreperson of the group that investigated Trump, Emily Kohrns has decided to start talking to the media.
This is not something she should be discussing with ANYONE, let alone news sources. The judge did allow some portions of the grand jury’s findings to be released; however, he ordered that a majority of that report was to be sealed. So naturally, she was on CNN on Tuesday to discuss possible indictments.
LMFAO
— The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) February 22, 2023
How stupid is CNN to ask that question of the Georgia Grand Jury Foreperson?
And for her to answer it!pic.twitter.com/VuIC6bDZVb
She may be an actual lunatic. She for sure just solidified this case for the defense. Even if Trump and/or others were indicted, they could appeal that decision so fast just based on this interview alone. But she didn’t only speak with CNN. Oh no, she also spoke with MSNBC.
What fresh hell⁉️
— Christopher Webb (@cwebbonline) February 22, 2023
Not sure what I was expecting when I heard about a Trump grand jury foreperson speaking out about indictments, but it wasn’t this. pic.twitter.com/bOFCxGwnPm
What an absolute moron. My favorite part about this whole fiasco is the reaction from the left-wing media. Anderson Cooper is less than thrilled about all of this.
Team Trump has to be raising glasses in celebration of this absolute nut case being the Special Grand Jury foreperson. pic.twitter.com/lEIIBWAzc5
— Godwin Meter (@GodwinMeter) February 22, 2023
The ladies from The View thinks she needs to “be keeping her bazoo shut.”
The View PANICS over Georgia grand jury foreperson "compromising the integrity of the investigation."
— Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) February 22, 2023
"Shouldn't she be keeping her big bazoo shut?!" Joy Behar sneers. "Everybody wants attention. That's what this is about. I think she could destroy the case." pic.twitter.com/AJxLTnCI2X
CNN and MSNBC should have known better than to ask her onto their networks. But the fact that she (so manically) answered all of their questions, discussed the grand jury’s recommendations and possible indictments, and mentioned Trump by name several times, she basically just destroyed the case for the prosecution.
6 Comments
“CNN and MSNBC should’ve know better..”
It’s all on her. It is their (the networks) job to get people on their shows and interview them. People don’t HAVE to go on the shows, and even if someone is interviewed, he or she doesn’t have to answer specific questions if she’ supposed to keep “her big bazoo shut”.
I’m sorry but I can’t get over UnJoy Behar talking about someone “keeping her big bazoo shut” and about others wanting “attention”.
Um……pot meet kettle….
What did they expect? It was a special Grand Jury, with special Grand jurors, and she was a special Grand Jury foreman.
https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2023/02/22/trump-grand-jury-forewomans-pinterest-page-is-real-and-its-spectacular/
Honestly, with the way she was acting on TV and her mannerisms… this tracks so hard.
Hey, ‘she’ is a stalwart democrat and progressive – just what the ruling elite want all of us to be. That ‘she’ would gladly throw everyone that does not think like ‘her’ in prison should be no call for concern.
/sarc