Reporter Asks Biden If There Should Be “Any Restrictions On Abortion At All.” Biden Says “Yes,” Tells Him To Read “Roe v. Wade,” “Get Educated!”
Biden Snaps At A Reporter, “Count, Kid, Count!”
October 20, 2022
Shortest-Serving PM In History, Liz Truss, Now Eligible For Up To £115,000 Yearly Allowance For “Public Life” Expenses
October 20, 2022Hmm. Maybe Biden doesn’t totally understand what “restrictions” are? Maybe he doesn’t understand what it means to have “restrictions on abortion?” Maybe he’s not totally sure what “Roe v. Wade” says? I’m not sure, and clearly, he isn’t either, which is why he gives this sassy non-answer. As he hustled to his helicopter to fly to Pennsylvania for what would end up being a totally disastrous speech, a reporter stopped him to ask an abortion question.
“REPORTER: “Should there be any restrictions on abortion at all?”
POTUS: “Yes, there should be.”
REPORTER: “What should they be?”
POTUS: “Roe v. Wade—Read it, man! You’ll get educated!”
He actually got sassy with the reporter question right before this one as well. A reporter basically asks why not very many candidates have had him out to campaign with them. The answer, of course, is that Biden is far more of a liability at this point that he would be a help to a campaigning candidate. They don’t want to risk his damaging gaffes. I mean, even in this very clip, he’s about to give a speech in Pennsylvania during which he will say that John Fetterman’s wife will make “a great lady in the Senate,” confirming most people’s concerns that Fetterman isn’t fit for office and that his wife will end up pulling a Jill Biden and running things behind-the-scenes for her incapable husband. Anyway, Biden gets irritated and tells the reporter, “That’s not true! There’ve been 15. Count kid! Count!”
1 Comment
First Roe was “overturned” in ’91(?)…checking ’92. Second it allowed many restrictions in the second trimester and allowed total bans in the third. I have a feeling the Administration doesn’t support that.