Kamala Harris Suggests Roe V. Wade Decision Will Limit Choices Of Men
Whoopi Somehow Correlates Roe V. Wade Turnover With… Interracial Marriage?
June 27, 2022
Roe Is Gone, So What Now? Texas Funds “Alternatives To Abortion” Program For Moms, Babies.
June 28, 2022I mean… don’t be silly, wrap your willy. It’s truly not that difficult of a concept.
To be honest, I almost forgot we even still had a Vice President.
BUT HEY, THE DEMS FINALLY KNOW WHAT A WOMAN IS! Whoa. Amazing how easy that was.
Kamala Harris sat on a one-on-one interview about the Supreme Court’s decision regarding Roe v. Wade, stating that everyone now has something at risk.
Amongst other things, she stated: “We think about it, everyone has something at risk on this. First of all, if you are a parent of sons, do think about what this means for the life of your son, and what that will mean in terms of the choices he will have?”
Perhaps this will be the catalyst that it will influence people, men and women, to acknowledge the sanctity of intimacy and relationships.
Also, a box of condoms is like $7 at your local CVS. If the $7 is the issue, canoodling someone should be the least of your worries.
Kamala Harris is the personification of trying to reach your 2,500 word count.
It saddens me to know how badly the left wants our society to deem children as a disease just because they don’t want to take accountability for their own lack of self control.
I’m going to post the full interview at the end of this, because Harris says some pretty outlandish stuff (shocker), such as the reversal ‘stripping people from the freedom to make the decision about when they’re going to start a family.’
Did she have this mentality before or after she slept with a married man? Asking for a friend.
Here’s the full interview:
4 Comments
I didn’t even waste my time watching the interview. It’s bad enough that Kommie-la Harridan is posing as “vice president”. You stole my thunder about Scare-us yammering about the effects of abortion restrictions on males as an individual who committed adultery with a son that’s married to someone else.
Family planning has never been in danger, VP Harris. To my (extremely) limited knowledge on the subject, it usually involves planning intimacy around the woman’s cycle to maximize chances of becoming pregnant. I fail to see how even eliminating abortion outright would cause family planning to be in danger.
(Still trying to figure out this comment section. I can only leave a comment if someone else has, otherwise the textbox doesn’t appear for me and I can’t figure out the login process.)
Considering men were already on the hook for child support for 18 years if the woman wanted to keep it, I fail to see this as a significant change as he never had a choice.
Who wishes that Kamala Harris’s would of aborted her when she was pregnant with Kamala. I’m just kidding of course.