*Pats Greta on the head*
“A” for effort but you’re going to need to try harder than that.
According to several studies, 87% of wildfires are actually man-made, which would undermine Greta’s assumption that there’s a causation from the ‘climate crisis.’
Check this out:
Sorry, Greta, but fires are *not* evidence that trace CO2 causes fires.
"Arson, mischief and recklessness: 87 per cent of fires are man-made"; fire has been in a long-term *decline* globally. https://t.co/Pg0T8nsWbz #ClimateTwitter pic.twitter.com/ilhA6LaAWn
— Tom Nelson (@tan123) December 22, 2019
Welp, Greta, it’s hard to make a connection between the climate crisis and increased weather conditions when… it doesn’t exist…
According to The Daily Wire:
Far-left climate alarmist Greta Thunberg urged political leaders on Sunday to connect the fires that are raging in Australia to “the climate crisis,” while ignoring the fact that the overwhelming majority of Australia’s fires are man-made, many of which are intentional acts of arson.
Apparently the recklessness of those who reside/visit in Australia is so common that they have a nickname – “firebugs.”
Therefore, the only actual ‘climate’ participation would involve the high temperatures and winds that accompany the intentional igniting of fires. Greta makes a common error in judgment by assuming that, just because the two elements are correlated, it must mean the climate caused the fires.
The intense weather conditions simply make it more difficult to calm the acts of arson.
More from The Daily Wire:
“Any reader of the New York Times and other mainstream media outlet would be forgiven for believing that fires globally are on the rise, but they aren’t,” Forbes reported. “In reality, there was a whopping 25 percent decrease in the area burned from 2003 to 2019, according to NASA.”
Hmm. Interesting food for thought, amiright?
But, I guess that’s why we can’t really rely on a child to understand the bigger picture… or to do thorough research prior to spewing nonsense.
I don’t know if it’s because I made the mistake of jumping to conclusions for a big research paper at the beginning of my academic career, and was embarrassed when I realized such, but I always do my best to research a topic I’m not well-versed in before I start talking as though I am well-versed in the slightest.
So as to avoid making a total a$$ of myself.
I think we all know what they say about those who assume. But I digress.