

It always baffles me when mainstream media forgets that the internet exists and that it never forgets. Y’all, “PelosiGayLover” is trending on Twitter as the public points out the obvious discrepancies and oddities of the official Pelosi “home invasion attack” narrative. As a result of all the completely justified questions about what REALLY happened in that house, the official narrative is constantly being reshaped and carefully crafted to minimize damage and cover for the Pelosi’s and everyone who tried to weaponize this incident against Republicans. Leading the charge is the mainstream media outlets who are “correcting” details that they insist were wrong or simply misinformation. Mostly, they’re just adding to the long list of discrepancies and questions. But this one is primo.
Politico, who published much of the initial information on the attack, has just published an article titled, “Prominent conservatives share online disinformation about Paul Pelosi assault.” A very important quote from this article states,
“Among those baseless claims: that a third person answered the door when police arrived at the Pelosi home, which San Francisco law enforcement has said is untrue.”

Which is SUPER weird considering POLITICO actually reported EXACTLY THIS CLAIM in an article two days ago, titled, “Police offer new details in Paul Pelosi assault.” In that article, they said,
“Officers arrived at the house, knocked on the front door and were let inside by an unknown person. They discovered DePape and Pelosi struggling for a hammer…”

Hmm, I wonder where all these “prominent conservatives” might have gotten the idea that there was an unidentified 3rd person in the house? Perhaps from the mainstream media, INCLUDING POLITICO, who told us that’s what happened. But that detail is adding to public confusion, so now they’re saying it’s just not true, and blasting “prominent conservatives” for spreading misinformation and “baseless claims.” You know, the ones they read in POLITICO.
1 Comment
The masters of Politico and similar left-wing sites sincerely believe that their ideological adversaries are both stupid and without memories. Moreover, that belief must be invulnerable, for as many times as it has been refuted by examples such as this one, even so it never deserts them