

Ah, yes. John Kerry loves to talk about the climate. He’s Biden’s “climate czar.” Don’t worry about the part where he hypocritically flies gas-guzzling private jets around the country and the world to win climate change awards and such. That’s no big deal, see. Just ignore that bit. What you should really focus on is how hard John Kerry is working to get this country to spend trillions more of YOUR tax dollars to “transition” foreign countries to the green energy agenda that he and his elitist radical leftist pals insist is essential.
John Kerry says he wants the U.S. to spend trillions of dollars to transition the economies of countries all over the world to green energy. pic.twitter.com/Oa4v5dyMsv
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) October 31, 2022
He wants you to be proud that the United States is “the largest humanitarian donor in the world,” even as that unnecessary and reckless overspending is driving historically high inflation and cost of living even higher. It’s tanking the value of the dollar, leading to economic devastation in this country, which is directly harming hundreds of millions of hardworking Americans.
Y’all, humanitarian efforts are an incredibly worthy cause. Our family donates to charitable humanitarian efforts on a regular basis. But at what point do we prioritize America and Americans over foreign nations? At what point do we say, “We’d love to help, and we will when we can, but right now it would be fiscally irresponsible to spend money we don’t have on efforts that are not essential and aren’t solving the problems our country is facing.” At what point do we stop pouring money into pet projects like John Kerry trying to “transition” foreign nations into a green energy agenda that was already instrumental in the total collapse of Sri Lanka? It’s poor judgement, but they don’t care because the wealthy elites aren’t the ones that will be paying the tab they run up. The American people will.
7 Comments
As soon as China starts matching the efforts being made by the US and the rest of the Western world, then I’ll believe they are serious. As long as they can look at what China is doing and say, “That okay, as long as the rest of us go green,” then we know they’re full of C02-rich gaseous bovine explosions.
First it was global cooling, an ice age is upon us, and the sky is falling. That didn’t work. Then it was global warming, the seas would rise and drown us all and the sky is falling. That didn’t work. Now it is climate change, and the sky is falling. Climate is always changing. Look up recent discovery of tree stumps under the Mendenhall Glacier in Juneau, Alaska. Carbon dating establishes that 6000 years ago there were trees where the glacier is now. The Mendenhall glacier formed 3000 years ago. After the last ice age, the warming continued until there were no glaciers in Alaska. Those there now were created during a mini-ice age which reversed and continued warming. As for carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, 78% of the atmosphere is nitrogen. 21% is oxygen. That leave 1% other gases. Of that 1%, 3% is carbon dioxide. 97% of carbon dioxide occurs naturally and would be there if every human on earth went to mars. Also, carbon is food for plant life. A warmer earth with an increase in carbon means a greener earth with more arable land for crops. Recent studies show an increase in vegetation.
There you go again, Frank, muddying things up with pesky little facts. Don’t you know by now that you need to focus on feeeeeeeeeeeeelings? Nothing else is as important as feeeeeeeeeeeeelings! 🙂
Should have been in prison since his Viet Nam days !
You know what I just realized, for people who complain about democracy being destroyed you’d think they’d want to try to put actual democracy into place. So why not put things like this up to a national popular vote so we can truly see if their climate agenda is where the people want to spend.
That would be a fun day, wouldn’t it. Too bad we know it will never happen, because they’ve re-defined democracy to mean, “When everyone does exactly what the liberal elite overlords tell them to do.” Which sounds to me like the definition of another word (starts with a D), but I’m just a silly conservative, so what do I know.
As long as he pays for it out of his out pocket – sure. Otherwise, not only no but heck no. He needs to live up to his stated zero carbon statements and reduce his personal carbon foot print to zero ASAP.