

Whaaaaat is going on, you guys.
America is facing a diaper crisis, and the anti-abortion movement may not be helping https://t.co/Uz4y07grfP by @srsalathe pic.twitter.com/9M7vonukhy
— Yahoo Finance (@YahooFinance) October 9, 2022
If you follow the link, you end up at an article that’s just a lot of words saying, “Charity is expensive and that’s anti-abortion groups’ fault.” Seriously– it’s essentially a hit piece against Heartbeat International, the world’s largest anti-abortion group, for spending money on overhead instead of using every cent they receive on diapers for parents in need.
I don’t need to tell y’all that the bigger the charity, the more money they need to spend on overhead. That’s why, if you want your money to go directly to people in need, you’re better off giving it to smaller, local nonprofits. But you’re probably here because you’re conservative, so you’re statistically more likely to know a thing or two about charitable giving, because you’re statistically more likely to be the people DOING the charitable giving.
I guess the folks at Yahoo and their readers aren’t generous enough to know this stuff.
Instead, they decide to channel Jonathan Swift’s A Modest Proposal, only without the satire. Not enough diapers to go around? Better get rid of the babies, then, haha!
But no, seriously. Get rid of the babies.
Brought to you by Planned Parenthood.
1 Comment
S–T happens.
Seriously, now they are justifying killing babies, because of the children.
Next up get rid of the old people so the younger generation can live the life they would be accustomed to without being burden with the high Maintenace of keeping useless eaters around. BTW: aren’t old people another population that are known for their heavy use of diapers? Depends!