

Hey, if Darrell Brooks is the one who plowed his red SUV into the Christmas parade, killing 6 and wounding some 60 others, and this man on trial does not “identify by that name,” then obviously he’s off the hook for the crime, right? It wasn’t him because he doesn’t identify by the name of the man who actually did the crime, right? All this “identify as” stuff is is just so stupid. This scumbag is really just taking advantage of the ridiculous “identity” lunacy that the radical left has made mainstream. Maybe he should identify as a cat. Everyone knows a cat can’t drive an SUV into a Christmas parade. They can’t reach the pedals and steer at the same time. Do you think they’d give him a litter box in prison?
Witness: "You continued driving into the parade route."
— Daily Wire (@realDailyWire) October 14, 2022
Darrell Brooks: "Who is you?"
Witness: "Darrell Brooks."
Darrell Brooks: "I do not identify by that name, nor do I know anybody by that name."pic.twitter.com/3d3Maf7B63
Darrell Brooks, who is representing himself, went on a 50-minute rant yesterday in which he also asserted that he doesn’t identify by the name Darrell Brooks, despite the Judge pointing out that he has provided no alternative name by which he should be identified. At the same time, he also asked that the case be dismissed because the victims weren’t present in the courtroom. He said that there was “no injured party” in the courtroom, which he believes violates his right under the 6th amendment to face his accusers. Also, don’t you just love that he always wears a mask? Safety first, you know. Wouldn’t want to kill grandma…
Waukesha massacre suspect Darrell Brooks is asking for his case to be dismissed because the victims are not present in court. pic.twitter.com/rmERQDZ1NK
— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) October 13, 2022
1 Comment
He’s actually trying the Kids in the Hall defense. He should have watched until the end.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJsQDPK-vvg