DOJ “Respectfully Disagree[s]” With SCOTUS 2A Ruling, Displays Blatant Partisanship

Today, Keith Olbermann called for the dissolution of an entire branch of the US government, the Supreme Court of the United States. Pretty radically extremist thing to say and likely not going to happen anytime soon, thanks to the checks and balances that exist without our system of governance (SCOTUS foundational to that). But in the meantime, Olbermann also called for the country to “ignore the court.” Also pretty radically extremist rhetoric, if you ask me. He doesn’t like a ruling by the highest court in the land, so he thinks you should just ignore it and ignore them, an entire branch of the government and a foundational institutions of our great nation. You’d think this might be such a radical extremist view that it isn’t representative of general leftist sentiment, but you’d be wrong. The DOJ, which continues to reveal itself to be a leftist organization, decided to take this opportunity to show exactly how partisan they really are.

Merrick Garland’s Department of Justice released a statement saying that they “respectfully disagree with the Court’s conclusion” on the New York conceal carry permit law. Wow.

This is so incredibly interesting because there are a whole bunch of people who “respectfully disagree” with the fact that Joe Biden is the duly elected President. They “respectfully disagree” with the conclusion of the 2020 election certification. And that respectful disagreement earns them the title of “insurrectionists” and “domestic terrorists” because they dare to publicly undermine and delegitimize the executive branch of the government. So if the DOJ decides to publicly undermine and delegitimize the judicial branch of the government by issuing an official statement disagreeing with their ruling, that’s just, what, totally fine?

Part of the DOJ’s statement says,

“The Department of Justice remains committed to saving innocent lives by enforcing and defending federal firearms laws.”

As long as those laws are constitutional…, right? Right?! Or is the DOJ insinuating that they would be willing to enforce laws that the Supreme Court of the United States of America deems unconstitutional, as long as the DOJ feels like it’s for the good of the people? Because wow, talk about undermining America’s government institutions, and threatening democracy and our constitutional republic.