Today, a Federal judge ordered that Hillary Clinton undergo further questioning regarding the email scandal that somehow got swept under the rug.
Cue the evil laughter! The quiet doesn’t always signify a closing!
I was hoping this would bubble back up! Let’s get to shaking that tree!
Let’s make one rule that Hillary can’t scurry away with ‘I don’t recall’ statements. Otherwise, it’ll have to turn in to a drinking game and, let’s face it, we’d all have to Uber home.
Oh, and Hill, do us all a favor and save your collapsing for after the questioning. Kay, thanks.
Fox News reported:
Clinton has argued that she has already answered questions about this and should not have to do so again — the matter did not result in any charges for the then-presidential candidate in 2016 after a high-profile investigation — but D.C. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth said in his ruling that her past responses left much to be desired.
“As extensive as the existing record is, it does not sufficiently explain Secretary Clinton’s state of mind when she decided it would be an acceptable practice to set up and use a private server to conduct State Department business,” Lamberth said.
The judge went on to recognize that while Clinton responded to written questions in a separate case, “those responses were either incomplete, unhelpful, or cursory at best. Simply put her responses left many more questions than answers.” Lamberth said that using written questions this time “will only muddle any understanding of Secretary Clinton’s state of mind and fail to capture the full picture, thus delaying the final disposition of this case even further.”
So many questions were left lingering for quite a while and my heart is so happy knowing that someone is cracking down on the case and calling the BS.
Lamberth even gave some examples of lingering questions about Clinton’s emails, such as how did she come to believe that her private emails would be preserved under normal State Department processes, who told her this and when, at what point did she learn department records management officials did not know about the server, “[a]nd why did she think that using a private server to conduct State Department business was permissible under the law in the first place?”
There are speculations that, in order to avoid the ramifications of the Freedom of Information Act, Clinton used her private email server intentionally.
Everything about it seems very intentional… so now the golden question is WHY?
More from Fox News:
Lamberth also granted Judicial Watch’s request to depose former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills, IT specialist Paul Combetta who was involved in deleting Clinton’s emails, as well as Brett Gittleson and Yvette Jacks, who were State Department officials familiar with Clinton’s private email server.
Further questioning will of course narrow the circumstances surrounding the Benghazi attack and other speculations about documents, emails, and text messages that existed during that time.
I hope it’s available via livestream. At the very least, let’s hope it’s recorded and available for release once the case is officially closed – coming to a theatre near you! HA, if only.