Bombshell New Evidence Proves Egregious FBI Misconduct That ‘Lied’ & ‘Framed’ Gen. Michael Flynn

The Ex-Special Counsel prosecutor in Flynn’s case has suddenly agreed that Flynn should NOT go to jail, and he should get probation instead, and the Feds are backing down from their corrupt setup case.  Happy Friday, it sounds like the prosecution wants this case to be over. (Wink.) I wonder why.  Sidney Powell filed a bombshell motion on Wednesday, Jan. 29, and tweeted about the egregious government misconduct, conflict of interest, and constitutional error.

https://twitter.com/SidneyPowell1/status/1222636812360962048?s=20

Powell tweeted again on Thursday, Jan. 30 and said, “The government has no evidence of guilt and that General Michael Flynn was always innocent.”

https://twitter.com/SidneyPowell1/status/1223013331495243776?s=20

If you’ve followed the FBI “Crossfire Hurricane” / Flynn case, you know how much corruption is behind it, and that with every update there is always a ton to unpack so here we go! You guys, this is UNREAL.

Feds Back Off Jailing Michael Flynn After Stunning New Evidence That Gov't 'Lied' and 'Framed' Him https://t.co/cH8TfGLZoS

— PJ Media (@PJMedia_com) January 30, 2020

The government lied, “framed,” hid favorable evidence, and showed “contempt for the law at every turn” in their treatment of Michael Flynn, the retired three-star Army general, and former Trump White House national security adviser.

Those charges were contained in a new filing in the government’s case against Flynn. And his attorney, Sidney Powell, was just getting started.

In the 27-page-filing, an add-on to her previous motions, Powell demanded charges be dropped against Flynn based on previously withheld exculpatory documents by the government and the IG report on FISA abuse.

The net result was that federal prosecutors publicly considered, for the first time, that Flynn would get no jail time and instead be put on probation for his previous guilty plea in what we now know was the beginning of the FBI’s “Crossfire Hurricane” operation against the Trump White House.

Powell asserted that Flynn was innocent, claiming the “IG Report is replete with exculpatory information that, had it been known to Mr. Flynn, he never would have pled guilty.”

Powell’s allegations of Flynn being “grossly misled” by his own attorneys were just the beginning. Powell averred that Flynn’s first set of lawyers had a “conflict of interest” and worked against Flynn’s interests by having him plead guilty to a charge of lying to FBI, a charge that itself was trumped-up by Peter Strzok and another FBI investigator. That second investigator, identified by Powell as Agent Joe Pientka, it turns out, was in charge of the Crossfire Hurricane op against Trump. Powell accused Pientka of lying on FISA warrants and withholding information favorable to Flynn from official government documents.

https://twitter.com/SidneyPowell1/status/1222745911757021184?s=20

The filing on Flynn’s behalf was possible in part due to the Inspector General’s report on FISA abuse.

Powell claimed that the IG report is “replete with information that is exculpatory to Mr. Flynn and damning of the conduct the FBI used against him. Flynn is one of the four original targeted by Crossfire Hurricane and unmasked by the previous administration because of ‘his purported ties to Russia.'” Furthermore, the FBI got access to Flynn’s information because of the Carter Page FISA warrant, at least two of which we now know were illegally obtained.

Powell believes that the original “302” report on the Flynn meeting, in which FBI agents believed that Flynn was telling the truth, have been lost or worse.

She believes that the DOJ’s Durham investigation into the underpinnings of the spying operation against the Trump campaign and presidency will uncover more information showing that Flynn is innocent.

ALSO FROM JAN. 30 REGARDING PREDICATES & 302s: Aside from Sidney Powell’s latest motions, Senators Ted Cruz and Lindsey Graham and John Cornyn asked a FISA-related question during Day 10 of President Trump’s impeachment trial.

(1/5) My 4th #impeachment question w @LindseyGrahamSC & @JohnCornyn: “When DOJ IG Horowitz testified before the Judiciary Committee, he said their DOJ had a ‘low threshold’ to investigate the Trump campaign. … pic.twitter.com/3dCNplBvpr

— Senator Ted Cruz (@SenTedCruz) January 31, 2020

On his Twitter thread, Senator Ted Cruz shared his questions from Jan. 30 and the video link to the IG hearing:

“When DOJ IG Horowitz testified before the Judiciary Committee, he said their DOJ had a ‘low threshold’ to investigate the Trump campaign. At the hearing, @SenFeinstein said, ‘Your report concluded that the FBI had an adequate predicate reason to open the investigation on the Trump campaign ties to Russia. Could you define the predicate?’

Horowitz replied, ‘Yeah. So the predicate here was the info that the FBI got at the end of July from the friendly foreign government.’ [You guys, BOOM!]

“Why is the legal standard for investigating Trump so much lower than the standard for investigating Biden? And why was it okay to get the information from a ‘friendly foreign government?'” @RepAdamSchiff spent his time downplaying the chilling abuses of power at the @FBI & @TheJusticeDept under Obama.

If you’ve not watched this Cruz/IG-Horowitz video yet, I highly recommend it.  The following clip was recorded during the IG Horowitz hearing. This is specifically relevant to the Carter Page case and to General Flynn’s case and it is pure GOLD.

Note: This covers VERY IMPORTANT INFORMATION that the Democrats won’t tell you.

“Why not?”