Kamala Harris recently participated in a town hall meeting on CNN. When she wasn’t promoting her grand idea of ditching all private insurance, she was dismantling the Second Amendment.
A pastor in the audience ultimately asked her what she would be “prepared to do to address the problem of gun violence.”
Her answer? Ban “assault weapons.”
“You know, here’s the thing,” she said. “We have got to have smart gun safety laws in this country. And we’ve got to stop buying this false choice. You can be in favor of the Second Amendment and also understand that there is no reason in a civil society that we have assault weapons around communities that can kill babies and police officers.”
Stop using such lofty generalizations. Define “smart gun safety laws.” Define “assault” weapon. I guarantee she can’t, because “assault weapons” aren’t A Thing to begin with. These morons are targeting cosmetic features of guns.
I’d also like to expand on one of her points. She said there’s “no reason in a civil society that we have assault weapons around communities that can kill babies…” I’d like to add that there’s no reason in a civil society that we have laws that allow people to murder babies minutes before birth. How about we tackle THAT, Kamala?
Oh wait. She’s BEGGING for it.
But here’s the thing. And I’m just going to be very, very blunt about this. You know, for years I’ve asked folks in D.C., you know, is the NRA real or is it a paper tiger? Like, what’s the deal there? And the feedback is, well, 50/50.
But here’s what I’ve witnessed and what we have all witnessed. We have witnessed a case where a seated member of Congress, acting in her official capacity as a member of the United States Congress, was shot and permanently injured. Her name is Gabby Giffords. The people who work with her every day, who know her — you know, we have colleagues, we know them, we know their children, we break bread, we share holiday moments with them — the people who knew her didn’t act.
She was acting in her official capacity, not on vacation somewhere. You would think even out of self-interest they would have acted. They failed to act. Twenty 6- and 7-year-old babies were massacred in Connecticut. They failed to act.
Here’s what I think. I think that somebody should have required — and this is going to sound very harsh — I think somebody should have required all those members of Congress to go in a room, in a locked room, no press, no one, nobody else, and look at the autopsy photographs of those babies. And then you vote your conscience. This has become a political issue.
Similarly, I think you heartless pro-abortion hags should be locked in a room and forced to look at pictures of aborted babies. Do we have a deal?
“This has become a political issue, and it is — there is no reason why we cannot have reasonable gun safety laws in this country,” she continued. “And guess what, guys? Here’s the reality of it, also. We’re not waiting for a good idea. We have the good ideas: an assault weapons ban, background checks. Right? We’re not waiting for a tragedy. We have seen the worst human tragedies we can imagine.”
“So what’s missing?” she asked. “What’s missing is people in the United States Congress to have the courage to act the right way.”
What’s missing is YOUR COMMON SENSE. Banning “scary” looking weapons won’t save children, and if you believe that, you’re a complete idiot.
One would think a career prosecutor like Sen. @KamalaHarris would have more regard for rights and truth, but after her performance at a @CNN-sponsored town hall, she only exposes herself as just another anti-gun, anti-freedom hack. #KamalaHarris2020 #WednesdayWisdom pic.twitter.com/bEnL3A0gFq
— NRATV (@NRATV) January 30, 2019
If you care about babies so much, stop writing laws ALLOWING for people to murder them, you raging hypocrites.
h/t RCP