Federal Judge Gives Hillary 30 DAYS To FINALLY Answer These Questions…

OMG… could Hillary FINALLY be forced to face the music?

A U.S. District Court judge has ordered her to answer two questions pertaining to the setup and use of her private email server, as well as the content of the emails themselves.

She has 30 days.

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW’s court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days. (1/6)https://t.co/Mnq2wTA8xG

— Judicial Watch 🔎 (@JudicialWatch) November 15, 2018

…Whoa.

In 2016, Clinton was required to submit under oath written answers to JW’s questions. Clinton objected to & refused to answer questions on the creation of her email system & use of the system despite warnings from State Dept cybersecurity officials. (2/6)https://t.co/Mnq2wTA8xG

— Judicial Watch 🔎 (@JudicialWatch) November 15, 2018

And of course, she got AWAY with it.

Hillary Clinton also previously objected to & refused to answer Judicial Watch’s questions about the basis for her claim that the State Dept had “90-95%” of her emails. (3/6)https://t.co/Mnq2wTA8xG

— Judicial Watch 🔎 (@JudicialWatch) November 15, 2018

What about the other 5-10% those were just GONE? What was on THOSE?

But, after a lengthy hearing with Judicial Watch yesterday, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must address two of the questions she’d refused to answer under oath. The questions Clinton must answer are below. (4/6)

👉 https://t.co/Mnq2wTA8xG pic.twitter.com/o9NvesLxdA

— Judicial Watch 🔎 (@JudicialWatch) November 15, 2018

Judicial Watch President @TomFitton: “A federal court ordered Hillary Clinton to answer more questions about her illicit email system – which is good news.” (5/6)https://t.co/Mnq2wTA8xG

— Judicial Watch 🔎 (@JudicialWatch) November 15, 2018

Judicial Watch President @TomFitton: “It is shameful that Judicial Watch attorneys must continue to battle the State Department and the DOJ – which still defend Hillary Clinton – for basic answers to our questions about Clinton’s email misconduct.” (6/6)https://t.co/Mnq2wTA8xG

— Judicial Watch 🔎 (@JudicialWatch) November 15, 2018

HOOOOLY crap.

And THESE are the questions:

“Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.”

With a new AG set to be appointed soon… is it possible that Hillary might have to face up to what she’s done?

I honestly doubt it… but we’ll have to wait and see.