Ronan Farrow Tries To Save His Credibility With New Hit Piece On Kavanaugh, And It’s Accidentally HILARIOUS

If you recall, Ronan Farrow is the weasel who wrote the “bombshell” story about Kavanaugh’s second accuser (Deborah Ramirez aka the woman who claims Kavanaugh put his junk in her face), even though nothing she said actually added up.

“She was at first hesitant to speak publicly, partly because her memories contained gaps because she had been drinking at the time of the alleged incident.”

Sounds credible enough to me! -Ronan Farrow, basically.

Farrow eventually admitted that Ramirez only “came forward” because Senate Democrats talked her into it.

Well, now he’s back. I guess he’s trying to salvage his credibility, so he published a new “hit piece” about how certain “witnesses” are upset that the FBI didn’t bother to speak to them.

“I feel like I’m being silenced." The FBI declined to interview primary witnesses related to the Kavanaugh allegations it was tasked with reviewing. Some of them resorted to sending in unsolicited sworn statements, which @JaneMayerNYer and I obtained: https://t.co/nY1uGCQ2Ki

— Ronan Farrow (@RonanFarrow) October 4, 2018

One of those mad, mad “witnesses”? Kavanaugh’s former suitemate Kenneth G. Appold. He said that he is “100% certain” that…someone told him Kavanaugh threw his junk in Ramirez’s face.

That’s right. He wasn’t an Actual Witness. Someone TOLD him, so obviously, he’s a credible witness.

“I can corroborate Debbie’s account,” he said. “I believe her, because it matches the same story I heard thirty-five years ago, although the two of us have never talked.”

That’s really not how this works. Like at all. And get this– The New Yorker contacted the person who supposedly told Appold about the alleged incident, and he said he had no memory of it. Like, at all.

Appold said that he initially asked to remain anonymous because he hoped to make contact first with the classmate who, to the best of his recollection, told him about the party and was an eyewitness to the incident. He said that he had not been able to get any response from that person, despite multiple attempts to do so. The New Yorker reached the classmate, but he said that he had no memory of the incident.

Oh. That’s unfortunate.

One of the other witnesses, who asked to remain anonymous, is mad that the FBI didn’t interview him either. His “bombshell”? He never saw Kavanaugh “physically attacking another student,” but he “recalled him doing ‘nothing to stop the physical and verbal abuse.'”

Kavanaugh watched someone be mean to someone once! -this anonymous guy.

Wait. This anonymous dude has another really DAMNING claim.

In his statement, the classmate also said that he recalled, “on multiple occasions, Brett Kavanaugh counting on his fingers, how many kegs they had over the weekend.”

OMG. He counted on his FINGERS. THE FBI MUST KNOW THIS. IT’S OVERRRRRRRRRR.

There’s more where that came from, but I think you get the idea. People who have no evidence of any wrongdoing from Kavanaugh are offended that the FBI didn’t bother to speak with them.

I mean, honestly. How do they think those interviews would go?

Witness: “My friend’s cousin’s sister-in-law told me that someone told her that Kavanaugh waved his junk in some girl’s face once. And he counted kegs with his phalanges.”

FBI agent: Alright. I’m writing this down. *does a few sketches of the cool Superman “S”*

COME ON guys. This is laaaaaaaaame.

You tried to destroy an innocent man. You failed.

There's still time for you to succeed at something in life. Can you sing? https://t.co/Rx3dUyohHt

— Jim Treacher (@jtLOL) October 4, 2018

For real though. Give it rest Ronan. This is just sad.