Guess Who ELSE That White-People-Hating NYT Bigot TRASHED On Twitter!

This just keeps getting beeeetter and better.

So that racist “White people suck” chick the left is rallying around?

She doesn’t JUST hate white people.

She hates the new employer that is going out of their way to defend her outright bigotry.

After a bad day, some people come home and kick the furniture. I get on the internet and make fun of the New York Times.

— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) November 25, 2013

Turns out lil miss thing has it OUT for the New York Times.

Funny how that works, right?

According to Breitbart:

The New York Times went out on a limb to defend its new hire, Sarah Jeong, after the far-left writer’s long history of racist tweets drew public attention. Since then, more posts have surfaced showing Jeong’s history of trashing the very newspaper that now defends her.

Before being hired to serve on the paper’s editorial board, Jeong made a hobby of publicly trashing the New York Times and its columnists.

Jeong’s ham-fisted excuse for her racist tweets, which include multiple tweets comparing white people to dogs and another expressing “joy” in being “cruel to old white men,” was that she was “imitating the rhetoric” of trolls who attacked her. The New York Times uncritically repeated that excuse in its statement defending Jeong. It’s unclear how her attacks on the paper follow the same logic, unless there’s some hitherto unknown pro-Times sentiment among the web’s trolling communities.

Seriously though, not only does this chick go HARD on the employer that is now bending over backward to defend her bigotry…

She’s complained about them as recently as last year.

You know what IS good? That someone is FINALLY suing the New York Times for libel

— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) May 12, 2017

HAHA. Would you looook at that. Breitbart explains that while it’s unclear which lawsuit she’s referring to, there were two libel lawsuits that year:

One filed by a coal executive who claimed the paper falsely accused him of lying, and another by an Ohio State University cancer researcher who said the paper defamed him.

In addition to apparently celebrating lawsuits against the Times, Sarah Jeong also had a habit of publicly trashing its most prominent columnists. Her most recent comments were made little over a year ago.

I feel really bad for the 95% of the New York Times that already seethes with resentment over their horrible columnists

— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) April 30, 2017

The way the columnists are managed is an eternal source of bewilderment for me

— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) April 30, 2017

Even the unobjectionable ones are in obvious need of editing

— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) April 30, 2017

Ah, yes. This will make for fun chit-chat in the break room.

NYT Opinion = Thought Catalog for Baby Boomers

— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) June 17, 2015

HAHAHA.

And it keeps going folks, it’s sooooo good.

Seriously, this chick’s Twitter is the gift that keeps on giving:

Guys, what drugs do you think Paul Krugman does

— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) January 3, 2014

David Brooks wrote a very bad column and the world is again in balance

— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) May 23, 2017

@LJElkins @j_zimms Yeah and I don’t think people should publish Thomas Friedman or Nick Kristof or David Brooks. Columns: meh.

— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) October 24, 2013

@jilliancyork Lose Kristof too pleeeease

— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) January 13, 2014

Wonderful, wonderful stuff.

@jilliancyork omg

— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) January 13, 2014

Notajoke: I’m being forced to read Nicholas Kristof. This is the worst.

— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) September 19, 2013

I mean… she’s not even funny or clever.

She’s just an a$$hole.

i love how david brooks somehow managed to be infuriatingly bourgeois AND unbearably scoldy high brow about other people being bourgeois

— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) November 13, 2015

Brooks is an absolute nitwit tho

— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) August 11, 2017

The funny thing is I agree with her. HAHAHAHA.

But seriously… the hits keeeeep on comin’

I don’t feel safe in a country that is led by someone who takes Thomas Friedman seriously

— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) December 23, 2013

So… Obama?

A just god would not allow Tom Friedman to keep talking.

— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) September 8, 2013

A just god would not allow Tom Friedman to keep talking.

— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) September 8, 2013

I have wept and I have prayed,
I have prayed and I have wept,
and Tom Friedman is somehow allowed to keep talking

— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) September 8, 2013

Lovely.

Lovely, lovely.

Hannah Rosin shatters ceiling by proving women writers can be as hackish as Tom Friedman, too

— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) September 11, 2013

OOOh feeeminism!

And my favorite:

Mind you, if I had a bajillion dollars, I’d buy the New York Times, just for the pleasure of firing Tom Friedman.

— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) August 5, 2013

So… Are these people going to take off their “I’m with Sarah” buttons?

I don’t think they CAN.

I mean… can you imagine if they fired her over being a d*ck to her future coworkers, but not over being a FLAMING RACIST?

It’s just too good.