On Friday, President Trump teased the latest jobs report. He clearly knew it was overflowing with positive news.
Looking forward to seeing the employment numbers at 8:30 this morning.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 1, 2018
And good news there was.
We have a record number of employed Americans– 155,474,000. The number of unemployed Americans dropped to 6,065,000. The number of employed women over 16 hit a record (the unemployment rate for that category is 3.6 percent, which hasn’t been that low since 1953) and the number of employed men is at an “all-time high.” The African American unemployment rate is at an all-time low (5.9 percent), and the overall unemployment rate is a spry 3.8 percent, the lowest number in 18 years.
Heck to the yeah.
Leave it to libs to somehow twist this into being a bad thing. Instead of focusing on the stellar report, they decided to freak out over Trump’s pre-jobs report tease. In fact, CNN’s John King straight up challenged everyone to find ONE President of the past who has DARED to tease a jobs report before its official release.
The GOP delivered.
Today the media hyperventilated when @realDonaldTrump teased the monthly Jobs Report.
They dared us to find a president who had done this before.
We did. ⬇ pic.twitter.com/lHro5miD04— GOP (@GOP) June 1, 2018
GOP out with response to @JohnKingCNN‘s dare that no one could find any president commenting on jobs numbers ahead of release. President Obama, who usually had weak numbers, sometimes warned about them a day ahead, for example: https://t.co/lpJbMiCopZ
— Mollie (@MZHemingway) June 1, 2018
This is an example of the proper way to use social media to fight poor journalism and false claims. @JohnKingCNN at #CNN needs to go on the air and let people know that he made a mistake. I think if journalists would admit errors they could regain some credibility. https://t.co/G98q9mf0tq
— R. Opinion (@ROpinion) June 2, 2018
The only difference? Obama was preparing us for a sucktastic report. Trump was preparing us for a great one.
I don’t know about you, but I’ll take the latter.