I still don’t know what to make of the Roy Moore situation. At this point, even if the accusations aren’t true, his reputation is damaged. Plus, there’s really no surefire way he can prove his innocence. It all comes down to who sounds more believable. There really isn’t any “proof.” And honestly, Moore kind of sucks at fighting back in an effective way.
I think he’s toast either way.
I completely agree that sexual predators need to be held accountable. Yes, liberals. I agree with you! A legitimate sexual predator has no place in public office. But it’s kind of laughable coming from you guys. After all, there’s this guy named Bill Clinton. Maybe you’ve heard of him? Voted for him, even?
Mhm. That’s my main issue here. Liberals on Twitter are all, “OMG ROY MOORE IS A PERV. We CANNOT have sexual abusers in public office!” Meanwhile, their profile pictures show them donning #ImWithHer stickers. Her? As in, the woman who essentially defended and protected her rapist husband.
Do they really not see the problem?
Actually, some of them do. Cue MSNBC’s Chris Hayes.
As gross and cynical and hypocrtical as the right's "what about Bill Clinton" stuff is, it's also true that Democrats and the center left are overdue for a real reckoning with the allegations against him.
— Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes) November 10, 2017
Read this account, in light of all we've been hearing and reading this last month, and ask yourself if it's credible. https://t.co/8jymWjFpiF
— Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes) November 10, 2017
Does this sound familiar? pic.twitter.com/eCby6bxsGS
— Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes) November 10, 2017
I know, I know. Did hell freeze over?
His fans are NOT happy he’s pointing that out.
Why are u doing this?
— Leslie Harpole (@TheRobinStudio) November 11, 2017
Why? We dealt with that at the time. There was an impeachment. It was litigated to death. What else is required?
— Dan Lupovitz (@dblupovitz) November 10, 2017
But… why are we talking Bill Clinton? is this his news cycle? is he a GOP enabler?
Did he vote for our current AltPres?
is he saying, even IF Moore is groper/Pedophile, better then Dem of any kind.
just curious. seems hypocrisy excuse clears all again.— Ray Bilodeau (@Ptaray) November 10, 2017
Last I heard Bill Clinton isn’t running for office. Did I miss something?
— Just Kathy (@Real_IG_Fan) November 10, 2017
As someone who came of age during the Bush years (for context), I just don't see why it's relevant. He's not *running* for anything, and he's not in office.
— Michael Carmody (@MadCarmody) November 10, 2017
1: Clinton isn’t running for a Senate seat.
2: Allegation doesn’t include an underage girl
3: Roy Moore had no business with 14 yo
4: Admits to dating other older girls 16, 17, 18
5: No man would ever forget doing this.— Goodernu (@DavidGoodernu) November 11, 2017
chris i appreciate your quest for objectivity, but Clinton is no longer in office and to reignite it to try to balance Moores behavior is distorted thinking. You don’t start comparing victims and their plights. Each is different and should be dealt with differently. stop
— M (@botchedprez) November 11, 2017
I understand Bill isn’t running for office. But liberals need to stop pretending that they’re so moral and pure and “above this.” If you condemn one, condemn the other. That’s all I’m saying.
"It's so gross and cynical and hypocritical of them to remind us how gross and cynical and hypocritical we are." But hey, I guess it's a start. https://t.co/VCE7Q57i0c pic.twitter.com/d4jCw5RSsZ
— Jim Treacher, which is admittedly a dumb pseudonym (@jtLOL) November 10, 2017
That time in 1998 when sitting POTUS Bill Clinton paid Paula Jones $850,000 to settle sexual harassment claims, and not one Democrat called for him to step down. https://t.co/DzSJDFUrgB
— John Cardillo (@johncardillo) November 11, 2017
The media covered up Bill Clinton's rapes, which is why many don't believe the Moore allegations. That's a serious issue the media needs to address.
— Mike Cernovich 🇺🇸 (@Cernovich) November 10, 2017
Yes. That’s the point.