Chicks-on-the-Right_logoChicks-on-the-Right_logoChicks-on-the-Right_logoChicks-on-the-Right_logo
  • ABOUT
    • About The Chicks
    • Our Story
    • About Mock
    • About Daisy
    • The Team
  • THE PODCAST
  • WALL OF SHAME
  • SPONSORS
  • OUR STORE
    • Our Book
    • Shop
  • CONTACT
✕

You Know What I Find Amusing?

  • Home
  • The Makeover And/Or Miscellaneous
  • You Know What I Find Amusing?
Let’s Talk About This “Sensitive” Topic, Because It’s A Huge Pile Of Crap In The Middle Of The Room
December 1, 2010
I Just Wanted To Post A Picture Of Tom Selleck Today, So This Story Came In Handy
December 1, 2010
Published by Mockarena on December 1, 2010

The way that galleries describe their art pieces.  It’s totally absurd.

According to this,  a photo of two brothers kissing, while one holds a gun to the other’s chest, is described as follows:

“In this provocative center image, the brothers exchange a passionate kiss as Thomas presses a gun into Lyle’s chest–conjuring the original biblical story of Cain’s treachery toward his brother, Abel.  The image transgresses many dualisms we use to structure society: male versus female, black versus white, ‘brotherly love’ versus homosexual desire.  And it raises provocative questions surrounding themes of domestic abuse between lovers, perceived violence among black men, and the dangers that come from engaging in an ‘illicit’ love–whether it be from disease, homophobia, or a lethal combination of the two.”

Really?  That’s what you get out of this?

I mean, come ON.

That photo is just one part of an exhibit at the Smithsonian that’s got people’s feathers ruffled.  Other pieces include images of Jesus covered in ants, some male genitalia, some dudes in chains, and Ellen DeGeneres grabbing her own boobular area.  It’s ART, you guys.  And you know who’s paying for that exhibit?  Why, us taxpayers, of course.

Many people see the entire exhibit as an assault on Christianity, and you could make a case for that, especially given that there is NO POSSIBLE WAY an exhibit featuring Mohammed or the Koran in any compromising way would dare ever appear in a museum.

The biggest outrage is that this pile of crap exhibit is being federally funded.  But according to this, that’s a total over-reaction.  See, even though over half of the Smithsonian budget IS federally funded, those monies are only used to “pay for buildings, the care of collections exhibited at Smithsonian venues, and museum staff.”  Ohhhhh.  See?  Taxpayer dollars aren’t paying for the exhibit at all!  They’re just paying for everything related to the exhibit.  They’re simply paying for all the stuff that’s required in order to HAVE the exhibit.  But the exhibit itself?  TOTALLY NOT PAID FOR BY OUR TAXES.  Don’t you see?

Anyway, you need to click the first source link so you can see some of the “art” for yourself.  And read the descriptions of it, so you can be amused by them too.

Share
Mockarena
Mockarena
Miriam Weaver (Mockarena) co-founded Chicks On The Right in 2009. Read her full bio here.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Posts

  • Candace Owens joins the Clancy supporters?!August 20, 2026
  • London Calling: Harry and Meghan are Headed Back to the U.K.August 19, 2026
  • This Was LOW, Even For Candace!August 19, 2026
  • Candace Owens Gets OBLITERATED in Chaotic 4-Hour Debate!August 18, 2026
  • Why You Should Always Say “I Can’t Afford That!”August 17, 2026

Follow the Chicks!

Stay Up To Date!

SUBSCRIBE TO THE CHICKS! »
Copyright © 2024. COTR LLC — All Rights Are Reserved. Content may not be reprinted or republished.