The New Yorker Is REALLY Digging For Kavanaugh Dirt

The New Yorker ran Ronan Farrow’s little “he waved his junk in my face but I didn’t remember until 45 minutes ago” piece. You know, the one that was so ridic even the New York Times wouldn’t run it.

Well… they’re still digging.

2018: the year of weaponizing college friendships pic.twitter.com/RkMke7UYSW

— Walter Olson (@walterolson) October 1, 2018

WOOF.

It’s making the rounds of Yale alum pages. I am so glad I behaved like a little angel back then.

— Walter Olson (@walterolson) October 1, 2018

Translation: If you went to Yale at the same time as Brett Kavanaugh and hate Trump and Conservatives, now’s your chance to take one for the team.

If Kavanaugh was the monster the liberal media is trying to make him out to be, you’d think all this would have been uncovered in the 6 previous background checks he’s had to go through. https://t.co/DzenUK8ZO8

— RBe (@RBPundit) October 1, 2018

But we need ANOTHER investigation, obviously.

Actually, why don’t we just let the New Yorker do the investigation?

Kavanaugh makes such an impression that when people remember him at events 35 years ago, he’s the only person among the half-dozen there that they manage to remember.

— AgainstTrumpDude (@TheAmishDude) October 1, 2018

Or while he was a judge for 12 years. Plenty of time for anything to come up.

— Brian *Beto* the Dreg 🌩️ (@infinitythestar) October 1, 2018

Well, that’s because…

um…

OMG YOU HATE WOMEN YOU RAPE APOLOGISTS OMG.

I have a sneaking suspicion this reporter won’t return phone calls from people saying Kav was a nice guy and above reproach.

— Duke Selden (@DukeSelden) October 1, 2018

Of course not.

But just as a reminder, it actually doesn’t matter if he’s guilty or not. The narrative has ENTIRELY shifted to “It’s gross that he’s getting so mad about people trying to ruin his life.”

The positive things don’t make him less of a liar or give him a judicial temperment.

— bad indian girl (@bad_indian_girl) October 1, 2018

His judicial temperament is very professional. What you saw at the hearings was his falsely-accused-of-rape temperament. https://t.co/Gwuod5Y20a

— Larry Seltzer (@lseltzer) October 1, 2018

Yeah well that was a job interview. Foaming at the mouth to please Trump, making ridiculous partisan accusations and committing perjury multiple times is NOT judicial temperment.

— bad indian girl (@bad_indian_girl) October 1, 2018

I’ve never been accused of gang rape at a job interview, have you?

As Lindsey Graham so PERFECTLY put it – Brett Kavanaugh isn’t being put through a “job interview” -so we can stop that charade right now.

No, this is not a “job interview” anymore.

Brett Kavanaugh, and his family, are being put through HELL.

…and given THAT… Yeah. This is the right “temperament.”