The New York Times REFUSED To Run Second Accuser’s Shaky Story

Kavanaugh’s accuser’s story is so weak, the freaking NEW YORK TIMES refused to run it.

Flat out refused.

The Times interviewed dozens to corroborate 2nd allegation against Kavanaugh and could find no one with firsthand knowledge. Ramirez told ex-classmates she couldn’t be certain Kavanaugh was the one who exposed himself. ⁦@SherylNYT⁩ ⁦@npfandos⁩ https://t.co/lGVc4hJzEU

— Peter Baker (@peterbakernyt) September 24, 2018

This is the SAME New York Times that ran that “Anonymous op-ed.”

This is the SAME New York Times that has repeatedly stepped on RAKES as the weed out “fake news.”

It was too shaky for THEM.

From The New York Times:

In a statement, Judge Kavanaugh denied the allegation from the woman, Deborah Ramirez, and called it “a smear, plain and simple.” The New Yorker did not confirm with other eyewitnesses that Judge Kavanaugh was at the party.

The Times had interviewed several dozen people over the past week in an attempt to corroborate her story, and could find no one with firsthand knowledge. Ms. Ramirez herself contacted former Yale classmates asking if they recalled the incident and told some of them that she could not be certain Mr. Kavanaugh was the one who exposed himself.

Yeah. We can be done talking about this one now, right?

So it was too shaky for the New York Times, but the New Yorker went with it. Very telling. https://t.co/vL3xfqqQyb

— Brit Hume (@brithume) September 24, 2018

VERY telling.

Strange New Respect for NYT standards 🙂

— Jonathan Martin (@jmartNYT) September 24, 2018

I wouldn’t go THAT far…