Elon Humiliates BBC Reporter Alleging “Hate Speech” On Twitter But Who Can’t Give A Single Example

People have finally woken up to the fact that the establishment mainstream media is biased, hypocritical, narrative-driven, and incredibly manipulative. Truth and morals mean nothing to these people any more. There is no such thing a journalistic integrity in these organizations. Even though people are starting to realize it, the media establishment still largely gets away with it. But every so often, they get caught, and it’s epic. This was one of those times. A BBC reporter did a sit-down interview with Elon Musk and someone forgot to tell this poor guy that Elon doesn’t play their game.

He advises Elon that “we have spoken to people who, who have been sacked, who used to be in content moderation,” which is Leftist establishment code for “censorship.” Armed with this claim that they’ve spoken to these vague, anonymous, likely disgruntled former content moderators (who were overwhelmingly Leftist activists, by the way) who think there’s a content moderation issue, the reporter claims that “there’s not enough people to police this stuff.” And by “this stuff,” he explains that he means “hate speech,” by which he really means “anything he and his political allies don’t like for people to be allowed to say.” So Elon, who doesn’t shy away from tough questions like this, asks him directly, “What hate speech are you talking about?” Then he takes it to the next level and asks this reporter what hate speech he himself has personally seen on Twitter.

The reporter stutters, groping around for an answer that he doesn’t have, so Elon encourages him to give some anecdotal examples of hate speech which he has personally seen on Twitter. The reporter then claims, “Personally, my ‘For You,’ I would see I get, I get more of that kind of content, yeah, personally.” Still, no specifics, just a vague statement on the subject, so Elon presses again for him to clarify, “You see more hate speech, personally?” The reporter then sort of clarifies that he sees “more hateful content.”

Then Elon drops the hammer in the most hilariously gentle way when he again clarifies, “Content you don’t like?” Yes. That’s the issue here, folks. To them, “hate speech” is anything they personally deem to be “hateful content,” which is basically just anything they don’t like.

Elon then asks him to “describe a hateful thing” to clarify what he means by “hateful content.” This poor reporter keeps looking down at his script, hoping someone wrote some answers for him, but he’s out of luck and ends up admitting that he’s really just talking about “content that will solicit a reaction, something that may include something that is slightly racist or slightly sexist, those kinds of things.” HAHAHA! So he’s insinuating that literally anything that’s remotely controversial and therefore might “solicit” a reaction (yes, he meant elicit…), or which some might consider “slightly racist” or “slightly sexist” is “hateful content,” which is tantamount to “hate speech.” That’s absurd. And again I ask, what constitutes “slightly racist” or “slightly sexist,” and who gets to decide? I’ve been told in the last year that exercise, outdoor sports, highways, driving, coffee, dancing in the rain, and about 100 other things are racist and white supremacist, so by this guy’s own standard, any discussion of any of these topics is basically hate speech.

Elon points out this absurdity when he again clarifies, “So you think if something is slightly sexist, it should be banned.” The guy is freaked now and insists, “I’m not saying anything.” Well, I mean, he did just say exactly that–that things which are slightly sexist are what he is talking about when he says “hateful content,” which is what he meant when he said “hate speech,” which he believes should be “moderated,” which is code for “banned.” So… yes, that’s exactly what he’s saying. But it sounds bad when you lay it out the way Elon did, so now he’s frantically backtracking.

Elon again presses for specific examples of “hateful content,” but the reporter is doing his best to dodge the direct question, so Elon pins him down by literally putting his hand on his chin thoughtfully and saying, with what sounds almost like awe, “Hang on a second, you said you’ve seen more hateful content, but you can’t name a single example? Not even one?” Then the guy tries to claim he’s actually not using Twitter for the last three or four weeks, which is hilarious because the clip started with him confirming that he uses Twitter and personally has seen “hateful content” on his “For You” Twitter feed. So was he lying then about using Twitter and seeing hateful content, or is he lying now about not using Twitter so he doesn’t have any examples to give? Either way, he’s a liar who was caught trying to shape the narrative about hate speech on Twitter.

It just goes downhill from there for this clown until he tries to steer the conversation away from “hate speech” and instead brings up… Covid misinformation. HAHAHA! And this poor guy thought this was going to be a better topic? Because BBC has been as complicit as any of the mainstream media organizations regarding the spread of Covid misinformation and the censorship of legitimate Covid-related information, which Elon well knows. So Elon calls this poor guy out on BBC’s own Covid misinformation and censorship regarding masking and side effects of vaccinations, as well as BBC being pressured by the government to change editorial policy to control Covid information.

The poor guy says, “This is not an interview about the BBC.” At this point, I’m almost starting to pity this poor fool because then Elon says, “Oh, you thought it wasn’t?” Clearly, this guy thought Elon was going to play by the establishment mainstream media rules, and he certainly wasn’t expecting Elon to fight back against their partisan narratives.

Watch the incredible exchange here. It actually gets better the longer you watch, so watch to the end.