“Not All Students Who Menstruate Are Female.” This Is Our Government.
Adam (Crybaby) Kinzinger Is Selling Signed Copies Of The January 6th Report On His PAC’s Website
January 18, 2023
New Zealand’s Authoritarian Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern Resigns Suddenly
January 18, 2023Minnesota House Representative, Sandra Feist, is campaigning to have menstrual products placed in the boys’ bathrooms in schools. Her reasoning? “Not all students who menstruate are female.”
Yes actually, they are. A man cannot menstruate. Only a person that has a uterus can menstruate, and only women can have a uterus. While we are at it, only women can birth children and breastfeed too (looking at you Mayor Pete).
This woman is an elected official. People actually voted for her. We pay her salary with our tax dollars. How is this real life? It feels like the Twilight Zone.
The people who say things like “birthing person” and “men can menstruate” are the same people that have been telling us to “follow the science” for the last almost 3 years. Sorry not sorry for not listening to these whackadoodles.
In the clip, she also mentions that, “there are a lot of schools that are moving towards gender neutral bathrooms.” If that doesn’t boil your blood, it should. If you are a parent/grandparent/guardian/or just a concerned citizen of your town, I encourage you to find out if this includes schools in your area. Go to School Board meetings, make your voice heard. This is not OK.
Gender neutral bathrooms in schools is just another way to groom children. There are some complete whack jobs teaching in schools today, just scroll through Libs of TikTok’s Twitter feed and see all of the leftwing psychos putting their crazy all over the internet for the world to see without hesitation. Allowing gender neutral bathrooms is just making it easier for these psychos to corrupt the children they’re teaching.
4 Comments
I’m going to disagree slightly.
“she also mentions that, “there are a lot of schools that are moving towards gender neutral bathrooms.” If that doesn’t boil your blood, it should.”
“Gender neutral” bathrooms should be the goal everywhere, just not the way these nutjobs mean. It should be one single…uh, facility(?) per person, not these group things. One toilet (maybe also a urinal), one sink, and one full, locking door. If there is to be a gang of 5 of them in a short hall, that’s fine, but one “bathroom” per person.
Perhaps someone can educate me if I get this wrong, but here goes: Is she talking about biological girls who identify as boys, and, therefore, still menstruate? Am I missing something?
It’s hard to tell as they constantly shift the goalposts and redefine terms but yes that seems correct.
The original argument was that sex and gender are different and that man/woman are genders while male/female are sexes. It seems that gender must completely override sex in all aspects otherwise the lie can still be exposed.