Why The New Anti-Gas Stove Push Is Really About Control, Not Health
Second Batch Of Classified Documents Found In Biden’s Delaware Home
January 12, 2023
Biden Creepily Whispers A Promise To Veto “Any Of These Bills” That Make It To His Desk
January 12, 2023The World Economic Forum has a group that did a shoddy and incredibly biased little study about gas stoves being bad for you and the environment. Then they took that shoddy study to the media and the government and advised them to consider advising the public against the use of gas stoves, or even banning them altogether. But as with COVID, this isn’t about health. It’s about control.
If everyone gets rid of their gas stoves in favor of electric, then all those people become dependent on the electricity grid. And who controls that grid? The same people in positions of power who are conspiring to force you to get rid of your gas stove and end up dependent on the electricity grid. Once you’re dependent on that grid, that means you’re dependent on them.
For example, in a weather emergency like a massive ice storm, all the people who previously would have been self reliant because of a gas stove would suddenly be forced to rely on those in power to provide for them during that emergency since they can’t rely on themselves. They’ll be forced to allow those people in power to have even more power to save all the people who rely on them. Extra “emergency” powers, extra “emergency” funding, etc. See how that works?
It’s not about the stove, and it’s not about health. It’s about control.
Now consider the logical progression of this power grab. What would happen if (when) they decide to manipulate the electricity grid? They’ve forced you to give up your gas stove and made you dependent on the electricity grid for an electric stove, and now they’ve decided that they’re only going to let you have access to a certain amount of electricity or calculate the amount of electricity you get based on a social credit system. This now affects what and how you can cook to feed your family. You become further dependent upon them. You’re now more willing to capitulate to their demands so that you can get electricity to cook for your family.
But let’s say the people push back against this gas stove ban and refuse to give up their gas stoves. That’s OK, because you know what the government can do? They can force the corporations to phase out the production of gas stoves so that you can no longer purchase a gas stove even if you wanted to. Everyone’s stove has to be replaced eventually and when that time comes for you, your choice will have already been made for you. They’ve forced you into greater dependence on them.
It isn’t about the stove, health, or the environment. It’s about eliminating anything that might afford people independence and self reliance. They need you to depend on them, not yourself, because it gives them more power. Don’t let them gaslight you.
9 Comments
Why no data on deaths by gas appliances? There’s no data or research studies showing anything to worry about or they wouldn’t be resorting to scare tactics. They tried the same thing with anecdotal sob stories blaming second-hand cigarette smoke for lung cancer. But don’t forget, they’re the “party of science.”
Let’s add millions of ELECTRIC stoves and ELECTRIC cars to an already overloaded electric grid and see how that works out.
Someone on this website once told me:
To be a liberal is to be one who can unquestioningly accept mutually exclusive or at self refuting concepts.
They’re going to have to pry my gas stove out of my cold, dead hands. I would hope the restaurant industry has enough sway to get this shoved into the closet where it belongs.
What happened to the days they came out with something like this and then left it up to us to decide our risks? Oh, and every stove comes with a vent hood, maybe people should actually USE them? Is that anywhere in the study??
I’d like to tell those twerps if they don’t like gas stoves, DON’T GET THEM! Aren’t we conservatives told not to get abortions if we’re opposed to it? Furthermore, where’s the “right to choose” with regard to what kind of stoves we use and the kind of schools babies get to attend when they reach school age?
What I find befuddling is that the people who are highly critical of past studies that were proven to be motivated by factors other than the raw data such as smoking’s link to health are the ones who swallow wholesale the completely crap studies published today. It’s like they don’t actually know how the system works but simply know how to parrot talking points fed them.
should have said smoking’s positive health benefits not just link to health.
There were health benefits to smoking, it was an appetite suppressant. I think the rise in obesity came with the decrease in smoking. I can’t prove it, just my theory.
There might have been one or two but there were a bunch of overblown studies from that period. The oil industry microwaves and hell just the breakfast industry had a lot of studies that were very much cherry picked or outright fabricated to the point that if these people were following the data trends instead of the media trends they would very clearly not follow the information they are being fed. Sheep will be sheep.