Whiny Kamala Is Annoyed Media Isn’t Covering “The Strength Of My Leadership”

Here’s the thing. The corrupt mainstream media certainly isn’t above embellishing, stretching the truth, lying about details, or even outright fabricating entire stories. But even they aren’t good enough to focus on the nonexistent strength of Kamala’s leadership. There does actually have to be some strength of leadership on which they can focus in order to focus on strength of leadership. But Kamala Harris is a clown, a global joke, and a national embarrassment. She’s shown absolutely no strength and has done absolutely no leading, and so there is no strength of leadership on which the mainstream media can focus.

In a propaganda interview with a Washington Post columnist groupie titled, “Kamala Harris had a most excellent year,” she whined,

“There are things that I’ve done as vice president that fully demonstrate the strength of my leadership as vice president that have not received the kind of coverage that I think Dobbs did receive.”

One might ask what Harris thinks are specific examples of the strength of her leadership which she believes the press is ignoring. Capehart, the Washington Post propaganda author, offered a couple of examples which I’m sure were carefully selected for this article by Harris’ team. And all three of them are less than impressive examples.

One was when she went to the Munich Security Conference before the Ukraine/Russia war kicked off. They selected this example, which I guess Kamala thinks that whole situation was a great example of the strength of her leadership. Which also means they must have forgotten how the entire world mocked her for one of her ridiculous word salads in which she erroneously claimed that the Europe had seen “peace and security” since the end of World War 2. She apparently forgot about the Yugoslavian civil wars, and various Russian attacks on Georgia and Ukraine, the East/West Germany conflict that led to the dstruction of the Berlin Wall, and numerous other European conflicts and occupations when she said,

“I mean, listen, guys, we’re talking about the potential for war in Europe. I mean, let’s really take a moment to understand the significance of what we’re talking about. It’s been over 70 years. And through those 70 years, as I mentioned yesterday, there has been peace and security. We are talking about the real possibility of war in Europe.”

Another example was her outrage about the leaked draft of the Dobbs decision. I’m not sure how hyper-partisan outrage over an extremely polarizing issue is strength of leadership, but she seems to think her outrage should have received more coverage.

And Capehart even helped her whine about unfavorable press coverage when he talked about the revolving door that is her staffing situation. It’s like no one wants to work with the woman but we’re apparently not allowed to talk about that unless we make it shine favorably on Harris.

Predictably, they didn’t mention her epic failure as a border czar. She’s done absolutely nothing constructive to address the situation, instead opting to ignore the disaster entirely, blame everyone else for the situation, or insist that the disaster is actually good. So I guess she’s “had a most excellent year” as long as you ignore the multitude of failures and simply pretend like some of those failures are actually successes. Otherwise, this is just propaganda.