

It’s an interesting thought exercise, and it also highlights radical leftist hypocrisy. The radical left says that all abortion is good all the time. Convenient access to abortion must be protected at all costs.
The radical left also says that trans-identifying people, and children especially, are basically the most protected class on the planet right now. Their right to exist as they identify themselves must be protected and their identity affirmed at all costs.
The radical left also says that “a good portion of children do know [that they are transgender] as early as seemingly from the womb.”
Harvard children's hospital:
— Ronald Kelly (@RonK3l) October 8, 2022
Babies know in the WOMB if they're transgender! pic.twitter.com/Oh3nUE9i9C
And if transgender children’s right to exist must be protected and their trans identity affirmed at all cost, and they may know that they are transgender in the womb, then would the radical left be totally fine with a woman aborting a baby who identifies as transgender? Or would they consider that transphobic and anti-trans violence?
If we could somehow identify exactly which unborn children would suffer from gender dysphoria or simply defy gender stereotypes and subsequently be socially labeled as transgender (because children aren’t actually transgender), would the radical left suddenly be against the abortion of these babies? Would they say it’s bigotry and violence and hate to want to abort a baby that would be transgender, and insist that the abortion of transgender babies be banned on the basis of being violent anti-trans bigotry?
5 Comments
HOLD UP, wait a minute!!! I thought the left said babies in the womb aren’t human yet. And Stacy Abrams says the heartbeat is fake. So how could they possibly THINK to KNOW they are trans?!?
Yeah, more classic leftism, recreating a narrative to fit today’s mental poison push.
When are we converting Epstein’s island to the Island of Leftists? Pls send them all there to hash out these ridiculous ideas w each other — forever and ever.
Abortion the black hole of Left wing logic meets gender the superposition of Left wing logic.
It’s the immovable object meets the unstoppable force except with Left wing logic you cannot win as logic is secondary to what they want to exist.
With the lack of coherent thought being shown in their grads Harvard should be shut down.
A little off subject, but in the same vein, I just read an article about all these graduate students in a teachers ed class in Maine, but one, walked out because their teacher said there were only two sexes. One of the offended students identified as “them” because it claimed it was multiple people.
My question is does each of “them” have to pay a separate tuition to be in the class? If not, why not? Then, why cannot several individuals identify as the same person in separate bodies and therefore be required to only pay one tuition per class? And, if two of the individuals who identify as one have sex would that be incest or self-love? These are future certified public-school teachers. Let that sink in the next time you drop your innocent elementary school child off at school.
If we emptied all the insane asylums and allowed the former inmates to dictate society’s norms, how would that be any different them the current freak show?
Natalie, a lot of the comments on twitter agree with you. (Glad I can see comments without having an account).
Kelly McGegor has a PysD. New term for me. I looked it up.
“A PsyD, or Doctor of Psychology, degree is a doctoral-level psychology training program that has an emphasis on clinical treatment of patients with mental health issues. It is considered a more practice-focused degree than the PhD, or Doctor of Philosophy, in psychology.”
This clearly says the degree is more fluid and not based in science.