

In an incredibly audacious and hubristic move, Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre in London has announced a new play called “I, Joan,” in which they will represent Joan of Arc as “a legendary leader who uses the pronouns ‘they/them.'”
Their announcement is hilariously defensive. They obviously knew people would be upset by this representation, so they felt obligated to assure the public that they “are not the first to present Joan in this way, and we will not be the last.” As though that makes it any better.
Our new play I, Joan shows Joan as a legendary leader who uses the pronouns ‘they/them’. We are not the first to present Joan in this way, and we will not be the last. We can't wait to share this production with everyone and discover this cultural icon.https://t.co/19T7baWsRk pic.twitter.com/lrgOC59TvQ
— Shakespeare's Globe (@The_Globe) August 11, 2022
I mean, come on. If they’re going to try to queerwash history, they could at least create and insert a fictional character that fits their radical narrative. Why do they feel like they can just assume the non-binary gender identity of one of the very few iconic female historical figures? And isn’t it kind of bigoted of them to assume her gender identity based entirely on her non-conformity to traditional gender roles of the time?
Women have been fighting for centuries to be valued as equals, and we’ve made so much “progress” that now we’re literally erasing the womanhood of iconic female historical figures. Because women apparently can’t have a powerful, fierce, religiously devoted woman hero who also doesn’t conform to traditional gender roles. She was an incredible woman. Not a man. Not trans. There’s no historical basis for this bizarre transgender representation of this iconic historical woman. In fact, the scholarly conversation regarding Joan of Arc seems to indicate the opposite. Their erasure of her womanhood is pure fiction, which the Theater admits when they say, “Theaters do not deal with ‘historical reality.’ Theatres produce plays, and in plays, anything can be possible.”
If you’ve suddenly become interested in Joan of Arc, here’s a very interesting thread by a scholar Dr. Alaric Naudé, a professor and linguist whose work “draws heavily on sociolinguistic, historical and biological axioms in order to produce a functional understanding of social, linguistic and biological phenomena through an integrated approach.” It’s long, but he gives some interesting historical information regarding this incredible WOMAN.
Joan of Arc Thread: You guys made me do this! Daughter of Jacques d’Arc and Isabelle Romée. Jeanne was the fourth born. Three older brothers. Jacquemin, Jean and Pierre. One younger or older sister, Catherine.
— Dr. Alaric Naudé ➡️ (@AlaricNaude) August 13, 2022
Father: Jacques or Jacquot d'Arc (Jacques d'Arc du Lys) Born in 1380 – Ceffonds, Haute-Marne, Champagne-Ardenne, France Deceased in 1431 – Domrémy-la-Pucelle, Vosges, Lorraine, France, age at death: 51 years old.
— Dr. Alaric Naudé ➡️ (@AlaricNaude) August 13, 2022
Mother: Isabelle Romée De Vouthon or Isabeau. d'Arc Born in 1384 – Vouthon-Haut, Meuse, Lorraine, France
— Dr. Alaric Naudé ➡️ (@AlaricNaude) August 13, 2022
Deceased 28 November 1458 (Sunday) – Sandillon, Loiret, Centre-Val de Loire, France, age at death: 74 years old
De Boulainvilliers spoke of her characteristics: “This girl is reasonably good-looking, and with something virile in her bearing; she speaks but little, and is remarkably prudent, in what she does say. She eats little, and drinks wine still less;
— Dr. Alaric Naudé ➡️ (@AlaricNaude) August 13, 2022
manages both her horse and her arms superbly well; greatly likes the company of knights and soldiers; scorns the company of the rabble; sheds many tears; has a happy expression;
— Dr. Alaric Naudé ➡️ (@AlaricNaude) August 13, 2022
so great is her strength in the endurance of fatigue that she could remain completely armed during six whole days and nights.”
— Dr. Alaric Naudé ➡️ (@AlaricNaude) August 13, 2022
References to wearing male clothing all point to practicality on the battlefield, the clothing consisted of a shirt, shorts, a doublet (padded undercoat), hose that were attached to the doublet, tight-fitting boots, leggings, a short coat of mail with a solid breastplate,
— Dr. Alaric Naudé ➡️ (@AlaricNaude) August 13, 2022
and an overcoat that reached until the knees. On formal occasions she wore dresses, even wearing dress style robes over her armour.
— Dr. Alaric Naudé ➡️ (@AlaricNaude) August 13, 2022
According to Jean D’Aulon, Jeanne’s steward, who often helped her to get in and out of her suit of armour and slept many times in the same room as Jeanne, described her as being “beautiful, strong, and well-formed (shapely).” We do not find any references to her being manly
— Dr. Alaric Naudé ➡️ (@AlaricNaude) August 13, 2022
Hair: She cut her hair into a bob, this was more practical for when wearing armour and staying out of the line of vision. Every description of Jeanne’s hair was that it was short and black. Her eyes were described as “large, dark, and grave”
— Dr. Alaric Naudé ➡️ (@AlaricNaude) August 13, 2022
Initially, Charles VII provided Jeanne with a suit of armour costing 100 écus. It was harnois blanc or a complete all-in one suit. This would have been lighter than a multi-piece suit and better for a woman. pic.twitter.com/fiDvnnD2RW
— Dr. Alaric Naudé ➡️ (@AlaricNaude) August 13, 2022
Witnesses in the city of Albi report her clad in white armour saying “Jeanne went armed in white iron, entirely from head to foot.”
— Dr. Alaric Naudé ➡️ (@AlaricNaude) August 13, 2022
Her remarkable actions, Charles VII granted her family arms and nobility. Her personal coat-of-arms consists of two fleur-de-lis, a sword and a crown. Previous family arms of Arc included Azure a bow or in fess, thereon three arrows crossed on a chief argent a lion passant gules pic.twitter.com/xr65Dt778D
— Dr. Alaric Naudé ➡️ (@AlaricNaude) August 13, 2022
In in April 1429, her suit was upgraded to a suit of quality to that of a knight of noble birth and would have weighed about 23 kg(50lb). Duc d’Alencon stated that she wore a calotte. (Head-covering without visor, “chapeline casque leger en fornie de calotte sans masque.”)
— Dr. Alaric Naudé ➡️ (@AlaricNaude) August 13, 2022
Jeanne also wore a military garment of Oriental origin, made of rectangular metal plates (usually of steel)-the jaseran.
— Dr. Alaric Naudé ➡️ (@AlaricNaude) August 13, 2022
Believed to be the helmet that Jeanne d’Arc wore at the Siege of Orléans (1430), one of the turning points of the Hundred Years’ War. There are marks of crossbow bolts on the helmet. pic.twitter.com/seVnsRgxJX
— Dr. Alaric Naudé ➡️ (@AlaricNaude) August 13, 2022
She was a remarkable woman, not a man. Not trans. Just a woman.
— Dr. Alaric Naudé ➡️ (@AlaricNaude) August 13, 2022
Additional Notes: I must point out that attempts to say that Joan was living a promiscuous life out of wedlock, sounds exactly like the trumped up charges against her. I would point out that NOBODY was willing to testify against her even for financial gain and that
— Dr. Alaric Naudé ➡️ (@AlaricNaude) August 14, 2022
even Inquisitors, you know Inquisitors the guys that ask questions and execute you anyway just in case, some of these Inquisitors even testified in here DEFENCE! The was no question about her purity, but they knew that all along.
— Dr. Alaric Naudé ➡️ (@AlaricNaude) August 14, 2022
Some of the English seem to hold grudges for a very long time, first they immolate an innocent woman in the flesh, now The Globe wishes to murder her memory hundreds of years later. Talk about overkill, she is dead already.
— Dr. Alaric Naudé ➡️ (@AlaricNaude) August 14, 2022
2 Comments
Jeanne d’Arc is also the patron Saint of France. During her trial they tried to accuse her of witchcraft because she wore men’s’ clothes but multiple exams proved she was a virgin (witchcraft included being promiscuous to them.) When in prison, her jailers made her wear women’s clothes to prove she wasn’t trying to be a man, and she did…but switched back to the men’s’ clothing when the guards tried to rape her (which would have also conveniently removed her virgin status as part of her defense.) But the corrupt court had her burned to death anyways. I wish France would put up a fuss over this mis-portrayal of an icon in French history but I somehow doubt that.
What’s next…England’s patron, St. George (of killing the dragon fame,) is recast as a woman by the Globe?
The Left actively erasing women from history. How exactly is it the Right wing are the misogynists?