Supreme Court Nominee Can’t Define ‘Woman’ Because She’s ‘Not A Biologist’

The world is batsh*t, y’all.  When we’ve reached a place in modern culture that educated, highly intelligent people are literally deer-in-the-headlights terrified to answer a question that most TODDLERS can answer, we’ve done far more than just jump the shark.  We’ve gone full batsh*t.

BEHOLD:

Senator Blackburn: "Can you provide a definition for the word woman?"

Judge Jackson: "No. I can't…I'm not a biologist." pic.twitter.com/TRlqUeDGs6

— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) March 23, 2022

This shouldn’t be a difficult question, but in 2022, it has become a question that if you answer it without the proper dose of wokeness, you’ll be immediately suspended from Twitter.

Allow me to assist Ketanji Brown Jackson with this MOST DIFFICULT question.

See?  Not that difficult, really.

Let’s play this out with different definition scenarios, so that we can all recognize this nonsense for what it is.  It’s UTTER NONSENSE.

Q: What does 2+2 equal?
A:  I’m not a mathematician.

Q:  What is O2?
A:  I’m not a chemist.

Q:  What is a cat?
A:  I’m not a zoologist.

I mean, you see how ridiculous this is.  The word “woman” has apparently become controversial, but not for any reason other than because leftist weirdos have MADE it controversial.  And it’s sad to see a Supreme Court nominee be so scared of offending woke leftists that she makes herself look idiotic in the process of answering a fundamental basic question.

“I’m not a biologist.”  OMG.