Eff-Dee-Ae App-yay Ooval-ray– Some Necessary Context

CNN recently published an article titled, “FDA grants full approval to Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine, opening door to more vaccine mandates.” And sure enough, we saw many companies and schools issue vaccine mandates the very day of the announcement.

But this doesn’t mean what you think it means. In fact, the media excitedly telling you that the Pfizer vaccine is fully approved is misleading at least, and grossly dangerous misinformation at worst. But hey, that never stopped the mainstream media from saying anything.

The FDA sent Pfizer two different letters on August 23, 2012. You can read them here and here. But essentially, what you need to know is that the FDA did not grant full approval (in the widely understood sense) to the Pfizer vaccine that has been administered to millions of Americans, and of which the company has significant doses stocked–the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine. That vaccine is still considered an experimental drug that is under Emergency Use Authorization.

Instead, the FDA licensed, or approved, a very similar but “legally distinct” vaccine called the Comirnaty vaccine. So, not the vaccine which has been administered to Americans more than 200,000 times and which the vast majority of Americans assume is the vaccine that was approved. In their press release, the FDA tells the public that they approved the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine which “will now be marketed as Comirnaty.” You’d have to have read the actual letters and understand the specifics of the approval to know how sneaky this statement really is.

You see, the FDA said that since the Comirnaty vaccine, which is actually the vaccine that the FDA licensed, is not well stocked by Pfizer and thus can’t be administered to the public on a large scale, the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine can be used interchangeably, even though it is not actually the vaccine that was licensed or approved.

So why does that matter? Here are a couple of things to consider.

The vaccine that is authorized for emergency use (the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine) is technically experimental, and thus people cannot be forced to take it, as that is tantamount to forced participation in an experiment. The Nuremberg Code and federal regulations prevent forced participation in experiments, such as forced vaccination with an unlicensed product. People are permitted to refuse without repercussions.

“Under 21 U.S. Code Sec.360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III), “authorization for medical products for use in emergencies,” it is unlawful to deny someone a job or an education because they refuse to be an experimental subject. Instead, potential recipients have an absolute right to refuse EUA vaccines.”

The ruling party doesn’t so much like this. They want a licensed product so they and their partners in academia and Big Corporations can legally force people to get it.

But, an unlicensed product under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) provides liability protection for vaccine manufacturers, distributors, providers, and government parties, which the ruling party very much likes, especially if they are going to force millions of people to take it. They’d rather not be held liable for the potential consequences of their decisions. Big surprise.

“But licensed adult vaccines, including the new Comirnaty, do not enjoy any liability shield. Just as with Ford’s exploding Pinto, or Monsanto’s herbicide Roundup, people injured by the Comirnaty vaccine could potentially sue for damages.”

Employers and schools are legally allowed to require employees and students to take fully licensed vaccines, like Comirnaty. But if there isn’t sufficient stock of the licensed vaccine to distribute to the public who are forced to take it, and the legally distinct and unlicensed vaccine Pfizer-BioNTechis permitted by the FDA as a reasonable substitute, and that substitute happens to only be under an EUA and thus provides significant protection to the people forcing the vaccine…

Then they can have their cake and eat it too.

They get to legally force a vaccine that has been licensed, but utilize a legal loop hole to be permitted to administer an unlicensed vaccine to millions of people who are mistakenly under the impression that the vaccine they are receiving has been fully approved, all while being protected from any liability for their decision to forcibly vaccinate millions of people.

It’s a truly brilliant plan, as long as you’re totally fine with being disingenuous and tricking the public using legal loopholes and semantics.

Additionally, the “approval” that the press has so eagerly announced isn’t actually full or current approval.

The FDA’s letter

“spells out the terms and requirements for 9 additional clinical trials over 5 years, and yearly status reports, to study the acknowledged occurrences of myocarditis and pericarditis that have followed the administering of the Pfizer shots. This license to label and manufacture is not a full approval of the drug, which clearly is still subject to many years of clinical trials.”

It’s only conditional approval, as long as they submit many reports over the next 5 years to study and address the significant adverse reactions and effects, notably as pertains to healthy hearts, being seen thus far. And if the studies show too many bad effects, the drug won’t get fully approved (because it isn’t fully approved now) and the vaccine will be pulled.

But by then, millions of Americans will have been forced to take it under the guise that it has been “fully approved.”

And they certainly don’t want you to know any of this, or else you might call them out on their incredibly misleading announcement about FDA approval and their duplicitous plan to protect themselves while they force you to take what remains an experimental drug.

Curiously, the former commissioner of the FDA (May 2017-April 2019) now sits on the Board of Directors at Pfizer.

Also of interest, Pfizer gave hundreds of thousands of dollars to Joe Biden’s campaign and other Democrat campaign organizations, and spent millions of dollars in contributions and lobbying such politicians.

It’s really all about control and money.