Transgender Activists Redefine Women — Change From ‘Womyn’… Now ‘Womxn’?

If I have to address you as a womxn then go ahead and address me as an idixt.

Try pronouncing that. Go ahead, I’ll wait.

Wouldn’t it technically sound the same when spoken? Like, imagine having a conversation about this change.

Person 1 – “So we’re changing ‘women’ to ‘womxn’.”

Person 2 – “Wait… I missed something.”

Person 1 – “Just replace the ‘e’ with an ‘x’.”

Person 2 – “So… wom-ex-n?”

Person 1 – “Uhm. No. It’s pronounced ‘women’ but spelled ‘womxn’.”

Person 2 – “….yes, much less confusing.”

Breitbart reported:

Transgender activists want to define women as “womxn” to blur and hide the biology-based cultural and legal distinctions between men and women.

The “exclusion of transgender individuals by some who used the [womyn] term has given rise to another spelling, womxn, meant to include trans and nonbinary women in intersectional feminism,” according to dictionary.com.

As if the English language wasn’t hard enough to learn already…

“Expanding the definition of women” renders the entire framework that protects women’s rights meaningless. Calling for it in the name of feminism is grotesque. Lesbians — women whose sexual orientation is towards other women — are on the front line here. Words matter. #LGBIssues pic.twitter.com/Q1mClRawdT

— LGB Alliance (@ALLIANCELGB) December 5, 2019

You can’t escape the reality of your biology, whether you’ve changed your innie to an outie or vice versa. We need to stop validating delusion and get to the root – the mental illness.

Once we address the roots and what’s nurturing them (or total lack thereof), the growth will be much more successful.

Check this out –

Feminist speaker stares down jeering swarm of pro-transgender progressives: "On what basis do women’s rights exist, if the word 'woman' is meaningless?" https://t.co/053YOQNd0j

— Neil Munro (@NeilMunroDC) November 2, 2019