Liars And Leakers — Pelosi And Schiff Think They Should Be Trusted

10.26.19 – 10.27.19 was a great weekend for America. As Trump said on Monday, “Baghdadi should have been killed years ago, and another President should have gotten him.

Baghdadi built the ISIS caliphate — it grew to about 7 million people, which equated to about the size of Ohio, but then they had a problem — and that problem started about two and a half years ago.”

The mission to kill Baghdadi last weekend was successful because there were ZERO leaks. That was not the case in years past. Under the Obama administration, and in 2017, LEAKS to the media are what allowed Baghdadi to slip away in years past.

All that and Pelosi has refused to give Trump any kudos for successfully taking out Baghdadi. Instead, she’s now worked up and whimpering back on Russia. “Because Trump trusted Putin and not her, and she was not informed beforehand about the plan to take out Baghdadi.”  Well, honey, I think this leak from 2017 is why you and the Schiffty Schiff were NOT briefed on the Baghdadi raid:

In 2017, a leak to the NYT killed a great lead on Baghdadi.https://t.co/jsENBPoEoC

— Ivan Pentchoukov (@IvanPentchoukov) October 28, 2019

https://twitter.com/PoliticalShort/status/888807162822184963?s=20

Surely this didn’t leak from Obama’s “scandal-free” administration (insert sarcasm).  I have a feeling those leaks are why a few Obama cronies, AND OBAMA, were kept in the dark about Saturday’s mission. After all, loose lips sink ships… especially when it’s leaked to the media.

Fox News covered the leaks in 2017.  And of course, the New York Times then demanded an apology from Fox for alluding that they were involved in the leak(s) that allowed Baghdadi to escape.  That said, I do not intend to point the finger and blame the NYT for that leak; I’ll only point out how this weekend the NYT referred to Baghdadi as “a special leader…who had a spiritual gift.”

Meanwhile, back to the “Pelosi Snub:”

Trump didn't tell Pelosi about Baghdadi raid, feared leaks could cost lives https://t.co/r9g0rAav1L via @amermilnews

— Patricia Wheeler (@PatriciaWheel13) October 28, 2019

President Trump said he chose not to tell House Speaker Nancy Pelosi about an impending raid against ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi because he feared a leak that would compromise the success of the mission or cost U.S. lives.

The president made his revelation about Pelosi and the leaking concerns during a Sunday press conference announcing the completion of the raid against the ISIS leader, Fox News reported. Those comments drew criticism from Pelosi and other lawmakers, who said they should have been notified before the raid.

“I didn’t do that. I wanted to make sure this was kept secret,” Trump said when asked if he notified Pelosi before the raid. “I don’t want to have men lost and women. I don’t want to have people lost.”

When asked again about efforts to notify Pelosi and other congressional leaders, Trump said some were in the process of being notified, and notifications came only after U.S. forces left the area to prevent leaks that could compromise the mission.

“I told my people we would not notify them until our great people are out, not just in, but out,” Trump said.

Cue the Pelosi and Democrat outrage on being snubbed and second in line to Muh-Russia.  Since Pelosi won the gavel and the House last fall, she’s masterfully coined the term “COEQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT.” This equates to Democrat wordsmithing that makes it seem like “Pelosi is President” of the House and shares COEQUAL powers with the Executive Branch. That is what many of her fans believe because she’s said the word “COEQUAL” so many times it must be accurate, right? Well, we all know it could not be farther from the truth.

Speaker Pelosi hates Trump more than she loves this country. Think about all of the NON-TRUSTWORTHY stunts she’s pulled since 2016. I mean she and her “woman-power-white-jackets” in the House nearly kept Trump from conducting his most recent State of the Union Address. Yet she is so woke she expects Trump, the U.S. Military, and all Americans to trust her now.

Yeah, because Nancy Pelosi feeling "respected" is so much more important than protecting the lives of our Warriors and the integrity of their Mission. https://t.co/d6YSgbwufs

— Breitbart News (@BreitbartNews) October 29, 2019

Pelosi and Schiff have both worked to undermine all of Trump’s efforts, namely on Syria in the last couple of weeks. On Oct. 16, the House voted to condemn Trump over his plan to withdraw U.S. troops from Syria. Soon after their vote, Pelosi and Schiff rushed off to SECRET AND UNANNOUNCED meetings in Jordon and Afghanistan to talk about Syrian solutions DURING THE ALREADY ESTABLISHED CEASEFIRE PEACE AGREEMENT IN PLACE FOR TURKEY AND SYRIA. Trump didn’t know about that trip. And if he did know about it, he didn’t ground their planes this time, but maybe he should have grounded their return aircraft from Afghanistan. (Insert humor.)

I’m old enough to remember when their plane headed to the middle east was “grounded” by Trump in the past year. I don’t think he trusted them then, or ever, nor does he trust them now. Tipping off the Pelosi Schiff team of jackwagons to this mission to take out Baghdadi would be equivalent to letting him escape AGAIN, just like he did before when someone leaked like a “Sieve” aka Schiff.

“If you’re worried about our troops, you can tell that, I mean — Pelosi hates Trump, and she’s going to do everything she can to hurt him."

Pelosi would have leaked Baghdadi raid to sabotage Trump, @SenRickScott says https://t.co/62e9pnDgqi

— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) October 28, 2019

Sooooooo yeah, they’re upset Trump held SECRET MEETINGS to take out Baghdadi while she’s trying to impeach him in SECRET MEETINGS.  That commands trustworthiness. Remember when you needed a reason to impeach a President?

Now, awaiting Thursday’s vote on Impeachment, Pelosi is proclaiming, “The House must be briefed on this raid, which THE RUSSIANS but not top Congressional Leadership were notified of in advance, and on the Administration’s overall strategy in the region. Our military and allies deserve strong, smart, and strategic leadership from Washington.”

Insert Pelosi’s brainwash and what her fans think: “Trump is still in cahoots with Russia because he talked to Putin before he talked to Ms. COEQUAL BRANCH Pelosi. He left her out of the decision, and that’s now the problem.” “Why would he tell a foreign government about our mission before our government?” Well, our jets had to fly over Russia sooooooo yeah, Russia knew. #AreYouARocketScientist?

Most sane people think Pelosi’s current outrage is nothing more than “Bologna.”
Watch Newt Gingrich here as he destroys Pelosi’s politicking on the Al-Baghdadi raid:

The idea that politicians need to be briefed on a military operation while young men &women are risking their lives is ridiculous. When I was Speaker, there were operations I wasn't briefed on until over. Pelosi knows this, but couldn't resist an opportunity to attack Pres. Trump pic.twitter.com/09gXilIxK5

— Newt Gingrich (@newtgingrich) October 28, 2019

So if Trump doesn’t trust Pelosi and Schiff, why should American voters trust them?  All you need to understand as to if Pelosi and Schiff and team can be trusted OR NOT is to understand what Obama’s cronies did to frame and take out General Michael Flynn. The one case on Flynn says it all.

Insider incidents can affect anyone, causing great damage to security or even loss of life. Do you have ideas on how to prevent and identify insider threats? Enter the Insider Threats essay contest now! https://t.co/92muny6Axd #CybersecurityAwarenessMonth #BeCyberSmart pic.twitter.com/XQ6Ze8hhFh

— Department of Defense 🇺🇸 (@DeptofDefense) October 24, 2019

Remember Pelosi’s famous quote on collateral damage?  I remember.  Pelosi only cares about Pelosi, and if there is collateral damage that occurs (even the loss of American lives) as a result of her corruption, she could care less.

Who do you think Americans can trust most? I think by now we all know the answer to that question.