WATCH: Hawkins says pro-choice student believes baby born after failed abortion is ‘not a baby’
A recently re-surfaced interview with Joe Biden reminds us that he MAY have, at one point, had SOME morals…
But he certainly doesn’t have a backbone.
According to Breitbart:
The unearthed clip comes from a March 2006 interview with Texas Monthly. In the interview, Biden describes himself as the “odd man out” in the Democrat Party, particularly when it comes to his centrist positions on abortion. While he maintained support of Roe v. Wade, he boasted of his vote against partial-birth abortion, something modern day feminists would likely view as problematic.
“I’m a little bit of an odd man out in my party,” Biden said in the interview. “I don’t vote for funding for abortion. I voted against partial-birth abortion — to limit it — and I vote for no restrictions on a woman’s right to be able to have an abortion under Roe v. Wade.”
“And, so I am — I made everybody angry. I made the right-to-life people angry because I won’t support a constitutional amendment or limitations on a woman’s right to exercise her constitutional right as defined by Roe v. Wade,” he continued.
“And I’ve made the groups — the women’s groups and others — very angry because I won’t support public funding and I won’t support partial birth abortion,” he added.
But what he said next would legitimately make the entire Dem party of today flip their lid:
Biden’s 2006 description of abortion piques further interest. He explained that he did not view abortion as a “choice” and “right.” He even went a step further, describing abortion as “always a tragedy” and calling for limiting the sheer number of abortions that occur in the country.
“It’s going to be very difficult,” Biden said. “I do not view abortion as a choice and a right. I think it’s always a tragedy, and I think that it should be rare and safe, and I think we should be focusing on how to limit the number of abortions.”
This, of course, in stark contrast to his “Abortion is health care, and health care is a right” messaging of today.
What’s worse? Someone who has never thought of an unborn baby as a human life? …Or someone who clearly does realize that unborn babies are a human life… and is willing to set that aside to become president?