Sarah Sanders Hits Pelosi Back Two Times Harder

Nancy Pelosi recently decided to describe a wall as an “immorality.”

I repeat: Securing your country with a physical barrier is immoral.

What are we supposed to take away from that remark? Because it sounds like she’s suggesting that physical barriers are immoral.

If she really believes that, I expect her to take down all the fences and walls that surround her properties. She should probably also remove her locks and all other security mechanisms for good measure. She wouldn’t want to be mistaken as a racist xenophobe, now would she?

Sarah Sanders responded to Pelosi’s idiotic remarks.

.@PressSec on Pelosi calling a wall "immoral": "I wonder if she will go on crusade to take down all the walls across this country? I hope not. People that have them around homes, institutions, the Vatican, anywhere else will not be happy w/Pelosi calling their security immoral." pic.twitter.com/27klirqkvK

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) January 4, 2019

“I wonder if she’s going to go on a crusade and take down all the fences and walls across this country,” Sanders said on “Fox & Friends.” “I certainly hope not. I’m sure that the people that have them around their homes, the institutions that have them — whether it’s the Vatican or anywhere else — are not going to be real happy with the fact that Nancy Pelosi is calling their walls and their security immoral.”

“It’s never been immoral to protect people,” Sanders continued. “In fact, it’s the absolute first duty that the president and Congress have.”

Yep. Securing the homeland. Democrats, however, would much rather waste time promising unconstitutional free stuff and throwing money at the weather.

“The president has been clear that he wants border security, and until he gets it, we’ll have to stay in a shutdown,” she said. “That’s not what he wants. He wants us to have a functioning government.”

Any questions?