The New York Times Wonders If Jared And Ivanka Are ‘Good For The Jews’

Trump Derangement Syndrome is real.

TDS has driven what was once a decently respected publication into a pile of delusional, mouth-frothing garbage that would publish something like this:

Following the Tree of Life massacre, there is deep division in the Jewish community about Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump. https://t.co/GxEhkY094H

— NYT Styles (@NYTStyles) November 17, 2018

Hmm. I see.

Now… I won’t bring Sasha or Malia into this, because unlike them, Ivanka DID choose to actively participate in the White House. Obama’s daughters, obviously, were not old enough to do so.

But imagine, for a minute, the response to “Is Obama Good for the Blacks?”

The answer, of course, is no. Obama stagnated job growth while stoking racial division. So he was not, in fact, “good for the blacks.” But even the HEADLINE sounds too icky for print, doesn’t it?

The article is basically just an excuse to write about how much EEEVERYONE (to the NYT, liberals are everyone) hates Trump – and by extension, his family. JEWISH OR NOT.

To some Jews, the couple serves as a bulwark pushing the Trump administration toward pro-Israel policies, most notably the decision to move the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. To many others, they are the wolves in sheep’s clothing, allowing Mr. Trump to brush aside criticism that his words have fueled the uptick in violent attacks against Jews.

“For Jews who are deeply opposed to Donald Trump and truly believe he is an anti-Semite, it’s deeply problematic that he’s got a Jewish son-in-law and daughter. How can that be?” said Dr. Jonathan D. Sarna, a professor of American Jewish history at Brandeis University.

“SOME Jews think they’re fine… MANY OTHERS THINK THEY ARE WOLVES IN SHEEP’S CLOTHING ABOUT RACIST, EVIL, NAZI TRUMP.”

Got it.

Alternate question: Is the New York Times good for the Jews? https://t.co/KfpT7RVAP3

— (((Jason Epstein))) (@Southfive) November 18, 2018

This is disgusting. Using a tragedy to make headlines? A very POOR headline at that… Shame on you https://t.co/Qu8TWz61Aj

— Katie Thulin (@katiet121) November 17, 2018

FULL OF IT> Ninety percent of the world’s anti-Semitism now comes from the left and radical Islam, not the right. But @nytimes lives in its own Upper West Side bubble. Liberals are the real reactionaries of our times. https://t.co/qymzaHoEA9

— Roger Simon (@rogerlsimon) November 18, 2018

It’s all so gross.