Avenatti’s Star Witness Hits Back: ‘He Twisted My Words’

Michael Avenatti gives SCUMBAGS around the world a bad name.

The man is truly a maggot.

Back when he wanted to hop on the Kavanaugh attention train with allegations of GANG RAPE, Avenatti procured a “witness” that “corroborated” Julie Swetnick’s INSANE claims.

Avenatti published her “sworn affidavit.”

URGENT: Below please find an email just sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee, together with a declaration from another witness who confirms a number of Ms. Swetnick's claims. These women deserve to be heard & interviewed by the FBI before any vote on the nomination. pic.twitter.com/upkoIWfKxz

— Michael Avenatti (@MichaelAvenatti) October 2, 2018

The “witness” is now claiming Avenatti COMPLETELY twisted her words.
According to this:

The saga is laid out in a new report from NBC News, which interviewed Swetnick on Oct. 1, days after Avenatti released a sworn declaration in which she accused Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct in the 1980s.

In an effort to bolster Swetnick’s allegations, Avenatti put NBC reporters in touch with the second woman for a phone interview on Sept. 30. He published her sworn declaration on Twitter on Oct. 2.

But um… That “sworn affidavit” was a pile of BULL. According to the WITNESS HERSELF.

Swetnick and Avenatti claimed that witnesses would back up her allegations. Under pressure to produce those witnesses, Avenatti put NBC in contact with the second woman.

In her Oct. 2 declaration, the woman said: “During the years 1981-82, I witnessed firsthand Brett Kavanaugh, together with others, ‘spike’ the ‘punch’ at house parties I attended with Quaaludes and/or grain alcohol. I understood this was being done for the purpose of making girls more likely to engage in sexual acts and less likely to say ‘No.’”

She also claimed that Kavanaugh was “overly aggressive and verbally abusive to girls. This conduct included inappropriate physical contact with girls of a sexual nature.”

But did SHE actually claim that? Or did Avenatti just write whatever best suited his needs?

But according to NBC News, the woman said in her Sept. 30 phone interview that she “didn’t ever think it was Brett” who spiked punch at parties.

Riiiight….

The woman also told reporters that she did not know Swetnick in high school. They became friends when they were in their 30s, she said. The woman also said that, though she knew who Kavanaugh was in high school, she never saw him behave inappropriate towards girls.

Two days after Avenatti published the woman’s declaration, she told NBC that “it is incorrect that I saw Brett spike the punch. I didn’t see anyone spike the punch…I was very clear with Michael Avenatti from day one.”

This is freaking GROSS, man. I told you he was a maggot.

So… what did he do when confronted by NBC?

Asked about the discrepancy, Avenatti lashed out at NBC’s reporters, saying that he was “disgusted” by their questions.

Avenatti is always “disgusted” by questions he doesn’t want to answer.

Any tough question is “VICTIM BLAMING, OMG.”

NBC also reports that Avenatti made inconsistent statements about the second woman after he released her declaration on Oct. 2.

Avenatti initially confirmed to the network that the woman who issued the declaration was the same who spoke to reporters on Sept. 30. But when asked about discrepancies in her stories, Avenatti told the reporters: “How about this, on background, it’s not the same woman. What are you going to do with that?”

But on Oct. 5, the woman told NBC News that she would no longer be communicating with Avenatti.

“I will definitely talk to you again and no longer Avenatti. I do not like that he twisted my words,” she said.

Yeah… he’s DONE.

Looks like this slimy POS #BASTA’D himself.