Kavanaugh “Gang Rape” Accuser’s Statement Raises MAJOR QUESTIONS

As I mentioned earlier, Michael Avenatti has FINALLY released the identity of the mysterious “gang rape” accuser.

He’s also released a long statement:

WOOF. Ok then.

So this is pretty insane…

But we have a few questions.

Is there any way to read this besides "I saw multiple girls get gang raped, kept associating with their rapists until I also got gang raped, and decided the proper amount of time to wait to talk about it was 35 years"

— Bernienomics (@Bernienomics) September 26, 2018

No. No there’s not.

So Julie Swetnick says she was raped in "approximately" 1982-after seeing this in 81-83, BUT KEPT GOING to these parties?

She SAW girls being raped and didn't stop it?

Who are HER witnesses that she claims to have?

Something is off….

— Nobody_really (@Type_ur_name) September 26, 2018

The parties were REALLY FUN other than the gang rape part, ok?

So according to Julie Swetnick’s accusation we’re supposed to believe that a gang of serial rapists were terrorizing young women at house parties and not only did no one ever report it but she KEPT GOING TO THE PARTIES? Oh and the FBI missed this on 6 background checks? Really?!

— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) September 26, 2018

Really.

To add to the believability of Julie Swetnick’s accusation she decided to seek out the representation of the most politically divisive attorney in the country, Michael Avenatti (Stormy Daniels lawyer), but I’m sure she’s not politically motivated… 🙄

— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) September 26, 2018

I’m fully aware that it’s common for rape victims to not report their rapes but I have a hard time believing a gang of serial rapists committed rapes with impunity for years and no man with decency reported them, no woman reported them and no friends of victims reported them.

— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) September 26, 2018

IT IS NOT VICTIM blaming to analyze Julie Swetnick’s accusation. If truthful then according to her claim she was NOT a victim at the time when she knew girls were being drugged and raped by a gang of rapists yet she said nothing + continued to attend their parties. Unbelievable.

— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) September 26, 2018

For those who ask "What would the 3 accusers have to gain by lying?"
• Instant elevation in social circles to hero status
• Instant celebrity to Democrats
• Could raise big $ on GoFundMe
• They stop the Supreme Court for now from being a conservative majority for decades

— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) September 26, 2018

BINGO.

There are a few other red flags…

What?!?

"Ms. Swetnick grew up in Montgomery County, Md., graduating from Gaithersburg High School in 1980 before attending college"

She was attending high-school parties where gang rapes occurred while a college student? https://t.co/7mSt80OR2Z

— John McCormack (@McCormackJohn) September 26, 2018

Yeah. That’s …weird.

So she's saying she was an adult going to druggy sex parties with 15 year olds.

— Phil Kerpen (@kerpen) September 26, 2018

Iiiinteresting.

Should we look into that? Surely there’s something illegal going on there…

So to sum it all up:

To review the Avenatti claim: a woman claims that when she was a college aged adult (graduated high school in 1980), she went to high school parties where high school girls were drugged and raped and she, as the adult present, did nothing but avoid the punch.

— Erick Erickson (@EWErickson) September 26, 2018