The Liberal Media’s Kavanaugh HYPOCRISY Can Be Perfectly Summed Up With Two Headlines

THIS.

ALL. OF. THIS.

Judge Kavanaugh has, on multiple occasions throughout his hearing, asserted that much like Judge Kagan and other judges before her, he would not be commenting on how he would rule on hypothetical situations.

NO judge SHOULD.

A good judge should take ALL PARTS of a situation into consideration, and then hand down a ruling based on legal precedent.

To say what he would do in a hypothetical situation is stupid and reckless – because he doesn’t have all that much information to go on… seeing as the situation ISN’T REAL.

Here’s what the NYT has to say about that:

YES. Really.

and here’s what they had to say about Judge Kagan doing the EXACT. SAME. THING. 8 years ago during HER confirmation hearing:

FOR EFFS SAKE.

This is freaking PATHETIC.

It’s so much easier to be a Democrat than a Republican when being covered by the MSM. pic.twitter.com/9Ypmo8Yva1

— Ari Fleischer (@AriFleischer) September 6, 2018

THIS IS WHY NO ONE TRUSTS THE MEDIA.

THIS THIS THIS.