Nathan Bernard is an INSANE LIB.

…Who blamed Ben Shapiro for a shooting in Quebec.
All these islamophobic pieces of shit have blood on their hands now. Alexandre Bissonnette, who killed six people at a mosque in Quebec City frequently checked Twitter feeds of @benshapiro @cernovich @prisonplanet. Sickening pic.twitter.com/VLvmCCG4TY
— Nathan Bernard (@nathanTbernard) April 16, 2018
And Ben responded:
The shooter is a deranged POS who should burn in hell. If you think I’m responsible for his evil, GFY. https://t.co/VHmCMoK6TU
— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) April 16, 2018
If we’re going to use your logic, then Bernie Sanders is responsible for the Congressional baseball shooting.
— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) April 16, 2018
But he’s REEEEALLY adamant.
Hey @neontaster @notwokieleaks @Halalcoholism, still think @benshapiro didn’t influence the Quebec City shooter? https://t.co/jXSKcnWBvg
— Nathan Bernard (@nathanTbernard) April 24, 2018
So a terrorist being influenced by Islam makes Islam responsible for terrorism?
— neontaster (@neontaster) April 24, 2018
No. In this case a sick individual indoctrinated with constant Islamophobic, fear mongering rhetoric from Ben Shapiro and others is responsible for the attack. Nice word salad though, Mr. Taster.
— Nathan Bernard (@nathanTbernard) April 24, 2018
What word salad? I’m applying your exact logic to a different scenario. Is the Dallas cop massacre the fault of Black Lives Matter? The perpetrator explicitly said that’s what motivated him. Come on, Mr. Consistency. Have some balls to apply your convictions equally.
— neontaster (@neontaster) April 24, 2018
Sick individuals can be influenced to action by online propaganda. If you think BLM was specifically responsible for Dallas that’s your prerogative.
There is clear evidence the Quebec City shooter was influenced by Ben’s online content and prosecutors seem to agree.
— Nathan Bernard (@nathanTbernard) April 24, 2018
If you all are so confident in your position that Ben is totally innocent then why not let a judge decide this? Just stick to the facts and all should be good, right?
— Nathan Bernard (@nathanTbernard) April 24, 2018
“Everyone I don’t like should be dragged in front of judges. If they’re innocent, it shouldn’t be a problem”
That’s how we’re doing it now, huh?
“Let’s drag people I don’t like in front of Canadian courts to let them decide whether free speech is culpable for terrorism” is the galaxy brain take I never knew I needed.
— neontaster (@neontaster) April 24, 2018
If there is nothing to worry about then why not decide this in court? That case would certainly help set a precedent for how hateful online content influences violent offline action and the appropriate legal recourse.
— Nathan Bernard (@nathanTbernard) April 24, 2018
It goes on and on and on… as you can tell, this Nathan guy is a bag of rocks, and “Neontaser” is OWNING him.
Nathan didn’t like that…. so he came up with a little idea.
Hearing from several trustworthy sources that the @neontaster account is run by @benshapiro‘s dad. Evidence I’m looking at is very convincing. More soon. pic.twitter.com/O71yf67il8
— Nathan Bernard (@nathanTbernard) July 3, 2018
OMG.
PS… Nathan’s whole shtick is making Shapiro look really tiny in pictures. You know, because he’s such a big manly-looking man himself. (Nice bug glasses, Rambo.)
It makes a lot of sense. Both relentlessly protect Ben under fake pen names. Evidence I have is… damning, to say the least
— Nathan Bernard (@nathanTbernard) July 3, 2018
“Anyone who uses logic to defend Ben Shapiro must be his dad.”
our best and brightest are on this case
— Nathan Bernard (@nathanTbernard) July 3, 2018
Their “best and brightest” is basically the equivalent of “the sharpest hot dog in the pack.”
Ummm…
Oh my god I think he’s being serious. https://t.co/nDmzoVN0LJ
— neontaster (@neontaster) July 3, 2018
Yeah, I think he is.
Neontaser, by the way, is most DEFINITELY NOT Ben Shapiro’s dad:

Get off the CRACK, Nathan.