I Knew Patricia Arquette Was Dumb…. But Not THIS Dumb…

Patricia Arquette is a leftist crony who thinks she has something important to say because she’s a celebrity.

I’m convinced she has two living brain cells, and one of them is definitely drunk…

A while back she had this BRILLIANT idea on how to “help” Puerto Rico, and I realized she may not be all there…

…but then she tweeted THIS… and I knew for sure she may have some sort of brain damage from recurring drug use or something.

You may have the right to have a gun but you don’t have the right to shoot it at people because you are simply angry.

— Patricia Arquette (@PattyArquette) October 4, 2017

Um…. right. Shooting people for no reason is illegal, Patty…. and no one says it shouldn’t be.

What’s your point?

Deep Thoughts by Jack Handy

— G (@stevensongs) October 4, 2017

Wow. Deep.

— Sifty Sutton (@siftyboones) October 4, 2017

Quick, what is the name of the person who has publicly argued that you have a right to shoot people simply because you’re angry.

— Kurt Schlichter (@KurtSchlichter) October 4, 2017

No shit Sherlock. Can you go to Chicago and send a memo on that? Maybe they’ll turn in their “undocumented guns”

— Kittie (@Flkittie) October 4, 2017

you may have a right to speak…but when you’re as stupid as this statement exposes…maybe you shouldn’t? #justsayin

— Louis S. Luzzo, Sr. (@GourmetGuyMag) October 4, 2017

I’ll take “no shit Sherlock” for a $1,000, Alex.

— 🇺🇸 Tami 🇬🇧 (@feduptami) October 4, 2017

But seriously….

Duh. I have the right to drive a car, but not to ram it into crowds. Rights have responsibilities. 99.99999999% of gun owners get this.

— Alex Welch (@awelch744) October 4, 2017

Then the twit tries to explain herself…

The recent NRA ads and videos have all been about arming up to be on defense or offense to protect from fearful feelings-

— Patricia Arquette (@PattyArquette) October 4, 2017

Oh, boy. oh…..honey. No no no.

The sweet little doorknob is convinced the NRA thinks you should shoot people because of “fearful feelings.”

Really?

I take back my previous statement. Make that ONE living braincell…..