The Democratic National Convention is next month, and there are already extensive talks on which security measures they’ll take. One idea? A wall of sorts. Which is SO WEIRD. Why would they want to keep people out? And what makes them think a wall would even keep people out? Like, walls are so ineffective, expensive, stupid and discriminatory.
See where I’m going with this?
Security at the Sports Complex during the Democratic National Convention next month will include “no-scale fencing” to enclose the Wells Fargo Center and Xfinity Live!, the Secret Service special agent in charge said in an interview Thursday.
But exact boundaries of the security perimeter around the sports arena, where the convention will take place July 25-28, are not yet finalized, Special Agent James Henry told NBC10.com.
“We’re not quite there to talk about the perimeter yet,” Henry said. “We’re probably a couple weeks away from finalizing that. But expect some closures.”
Closures, huh. Why? What about the peaceful protesters who want to talk to them about rigging the entire election for Hillary? According to estimates, there will be at least 30,000 of them over the course of the week.
FDR Park, which is across South Broad Street from the arena, has been designated a protest zone by the city. Pro-Bernie Sanders protesters have secured permits to demonstrate from Sunday through Thursday of the DNC week. In applying for those permits, protest organizers estimated up to 30,000 people could take part.
I understand that security is important, but I have a hard time taking DNC security measures seriously. These are the same people who preach for open borders on a national scale. But when it comes to Hillary’s snooty coronation, they call for no-scale fencing to protect her and everyone else. Am I the only one who sees the irony here?