This is so unbelievably pathetic.
‘Time Magazine’ deemed Nancy Pelosi one of its “Most Influential People.” Granted… that’s not necessarily a good thing. Even Hitler was massively “influential” if you think about it. Influence isn’t necessarily a positive thing.
So sure, Nancy has been very influential. I would personally say her influence has all been negative – but sure, she’s influential either way.
What sort of gets my gears turning is Hillary’s quote about her:
.@HillaryClinton: "@SpeakerPelosi is living proof that when it comes to getting the job done, more often than not, it takes a woman" #TIME100 https://t.co/oLvxA2Bb0x pic.twitter.com/sSDcpos9dL
— TIME (@TIME) April 17, 2019
Good grief, Hillary.
First of all, why is ‘Time’ quoting Hillary on this? Who cares what she has to say? Unlike Nancy, Hillary isn’t “influential” at this point. She’s completely irrelevant.
Second – why turn this into a sexist, stupid virtue-signaling monstrosity?
A lot of people agree with me that this is FULL dumb. Including many on the left.
https://twitter.com/arcadeyblog/status/1118524006372478982
lotta sexism for one quote
— TheSkye'sTheLimit (@ComingSoonOnDVD) April 17, 2019
https://twitter.com/USAPatriotMama/status/1118519880414896128
The libs are actually annoyed for a variety of obnoxious reasons:
https://twitter.com/TimC215/status/1118531849985380353
https://twitter.com/Blk_Cat713/status/1118511059667574784
How DARE she compliment a white woman?!
Influencial in undermining her colleagues, yes
— Ghost 🏁 (@bawssActionz) April 17, 2019
Lol.
Love watching them eat their own.
Why? Why the divisive title quote. Why promote something like this? @time in a time when we need to come together you promote this piece? Men vs. Women? It has nothing to do with gender ots morals values and culture. Be part of the change you have the audience, lead by example.
— Michele (@michelesmaine) April 17, 2019
…NAH.