The New Yorker’s GROSS Take On Kavanaugh’s ‘Crying’ Makes My Skin Crawl

The New Yorker may have just topped themselves on “hypocritical GROSSNESS” with this tweet.

At the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Brett Kavanaugh seemingly weaponized crying, the way a little boy does when he’s in trouble: https://t.co/qKkf3njodP pic.twitter.com/qLqhhUrc90

— The New Yorker (@NewYorker) October 5, 2018

Imagine for ONE SECOND if they would have tweeted this about Christine Blasey Ford.

Just IMAGINE.

The same left that tells us that men SHOULD be emotional,  that masculinity is toxic, and that MEN SHOULD CRY is also basically MOCKING Brett Kavanaugh for getting emotional at the fact that his NAME HAS BEEN DRAGGED THROUGH THE MUD AND HIS LIFE HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY DESTROYED.

This is disgusting.

They’re getting SHREDDED for it:

This from the publication that ran the Ramirez story, one where the accuser still can’t identify Kavanaugh as the assaulter.

You people are sick.

— just alan (@anythingbutdem) October 5, 2018

Pretty sure Dem protesters weaponized crying a long time ago. pic.twitter.com/wplfYh2T5v

— PoliTICKED the Podcast (@WPoliticked) October 5, 2018

But she did not? Wait, we want men to be emotional or not? Not too masculine but not too feminine?

— Kelly (@sunnydays878) October 5, 2018

I thought not crying was toxic masculinity?

— 🇺🇸JSBach1801🇮🇱 (@JSBach1801) October 5, 2018

The only “weapon” that was used was the coordinated smear campaign based on lies that Kavanaugh was a gang rapist. Now after all the false accusations and blatantly obvious lies, you attack him when he is down? The liberal media has no decency & truly is the enemy of the people.

— World news (@worldnews2_2) October 5, 2018

Sickening. Absolutely sickening.