So What’s This Treaty That Everyone Is Talking About With The World Health Organization? Here’s Some Information About It You Need To Know.

Here’s Dr Jay Battacharya explaining what’s happening:

Prof Jay Bhattacharya slams the WHO pandemic pact which would allow them to force governments to impose lockdowns.

"Lockdown strategy is not right. It's shocking that we walked ourselves into it without a fuss."

📺Freeview 237, Sky 526, Virgin 627@JuliaHB1 | @DrJBhattacharya pic.twitter.com/eCzJKnQMi2

— TalkTV (@TalkTV) May 19, 2022

It’s not just an internet conspiracy theory, but it’s also not quite as dire as you may have heard.  You can read the Snopes article trying desperately to spin what’s happening in as positive a light as possible, if you’d like.

The key takeaway from my perspective is that WHO hasn’t in any way earned any right to have MORE power, and to the extent any treaty or accord that the US enters affords it more power, I think that’s problematic.

But, the WHO Director responded to the accusations that this treaty will result in the loss of US sovereignty by saying, in part:

I want to be crystal clear. WHO’s agenda is public, open and transparent. WHO stands strongly for individual rights. We passionately support everyone’s right to health and we will do everything we can to ensure that that right is realized.

The first ever World Health Assembly, which took place soon after the WHO Constitution entered into force in 1948, was a watershed event in global public health. And like the proposed pandemic preparedness accord, this did not mean WHO usurped nations’ sovereignty; in fact it strengthened countries’ ability to fight diseases together.

WHO is an expression of Member States’ own sovereignty and WHO is entirely what the sovereign 194 Member States want WHO to be.

Discuss.