The liberals are doing everything in their power to pretend the attack in Manhattan had noooothing to do with Islam.
The NYT went so far as writing a “touching” story of how the terrorist was basically just a sweet little immigrant living the American dream before he snapped and murdered multiple people…
But… absolutely nothing to do with Islam. Not a thing.
The liberal denial is DENSE… but this might take the cake.
Nathan Lean describes himself on Twitter as “Author of The Islamophobia Industry (@plutopress); Understanding Islam & the West (@RLPGBooks); DC via the Tarheel State.” so I don’t exactly expect him to have a reasonable stance on Islamic Terrorism.
The man makes all his money by pointing at people and shouting ISLAMOPHOBE! at anyone who tries to have a common sense conversation about Islamic terrorism.
However, I didn’t think he’d get THIS stupid about it:
It doesn’t matter whether the NYC shooter shouted “Allahu Akbar” or “I love fried chicken.” Makes no difference in terms of impact/deaths.
— Nathan Lean (@nathanlean) October 31, 2017
Good Lord. He can’t be serious.
this my friend might be the stupidest tweet ever tweeted. Congrats.
— Mike du Jour (@MikeLester) November 2, 2017
Seriously?! The law takes take motive into account because it a) determines the crime’s seriousness, b) could be common among perpetrators..
— Tom Hawkins (@DocTHawkins) November 1, 2017
We must awaken to the threat of radical fried-chicken terror. https://t.co/9dq776aYTe
— 🇰🇷🇰🇵 킹백수 (@KingBaeksu) November 2, 2017
Who said that “I have been made victorious with terror”
— AntiChrist AntiGod (@Christgodtweet) November 1, 2017
You need to close the borders to anyone who enjoys chicken immediately.
— Grojak irl (♞) (@dna_sock) November 2, 2017
The difference is : there is no kamikaze yelling “Jesus is great”
— AntiChrist AntiGod (@Christgodtweet) November 2, 2017
It rather explains motive, giving us ability to prevent future atrocities (or just ignore it and wait for the next one)
— Jonathan Roberts (@robertsjonathan) November 1, 2017
The stupidity and the disconnect to reality is staggering https://t.co/sIqkaq6Ydj
— RedDevil 😈 (@Snakeeater36) November 2, 2017
The imbecile tries to explain himself, doubling down on the idiocy…
1/ The phrase “Allahu Akbar” isn’t a Muslim battle cry. It’s an expression of faith, for millions, that God is greater than their struggles.
— Nathan Lean (@nathanlean) October 31, 2017
Ok…. and they scream it as they murder people in the name of their god. I can’t remember too many terror attacks in the name of fried chicken, can you? So… yes. It matters. It matters a lot. It gives us their entire motive in two words.
2/ If “Allahu Akbar” was, in fact, some cryptic “battle cry,” then every Muslim who utters it would presumably be rallying towards war.
— Nathan Lean (@nathanlean) October 31, 2017
He can’t really be this stupid, right? OMG!
The phrase “Allahu Akbar” is not found in the Quran. Muslims use it to express a variety of emotions, in times of distress, & in prayer.
— Nathan Lean (@nathanlean) October 31, 2017
Muslims also use it as they commit acts of terror in the name of Islam….
….and of COURSE:
Man screams “Allahu Akbar” & kills people. Media: Terrorism!
White guy slays 56 in Las Vegas with battle-ready weapons. Media: Crickets.
— Nathan Lean (@nathanlean) October 31, 2017
Only on what planet does this moron live where the Media were silent about Stephen Paddock?!!
I myself have reported on him 20+ times.
This is unbelievable. People like this will enable the death of many more Americans.