Sally Kohn Accidentally Makes Every Law-Abiding Gun Owner’s Point In The Gun Control Debate

Liberals everywhere are crying for “gun control.” That, they say, will stop mass shootings for good. It just blows my mind. What single law would’ve prevented this? If you purchase a weapon through a FFL, you have to pass a background check. if you purchase a gun online, it has to be delivered to a FFL, which conducts a background check. Don’t even get me started on liberals who want to ban all semi-automatic weapons. They don’t even know what that means. It just sounds scary. Newsflash libs: Most of the guns people own are semi-automatic.

My favorite thing is when liberals attack the accessories of guns. I’ve seen liberals say we need to ban barrel shrouds. Barrel shrouds. You know what those are for? They stop you from burning yourself on the barrel. That’s it. Plus, they look cool. So they’re literally for coolness (heat-wise) and coolness (awesome-wise).

In other words, liberals have no idea what they’re talking about. And the truth is, they’ll never be satisfied. It will never be enough. They’ll always want to take away more. They want to trash the Second Amendment.

Sorry. I’m getting all worked up.

Back to the subject at hand. Sally Kohn. She wants to do something. She just doesn’t know quite what. I mean, she knows that we’ll never ever stop evil people from being evil, but we should take away all the objects they could kill people with! Or something…?

We cannot control whether others hate or turn to violence.

We CAN control whether they have easy access to deadly mass killing machines. #GunControlNow

— Sally Kohn (@sallykohn) November 6, 2017

Couple of things. 1.) Sally accidentally made a conservative point. We will NEVER be able to stop seriously evil people from being evil. We can’t control every single person who plans an evil attack. That’s reality. Thanks for reiterating our point, Sally 2.) Sally wants to limit access to deadly mass killing machines, and I’m just wondering if she’s including vehicles, knives, planes and pressure cookers in that description. After all, evil people have killed a lot of people with those objects. We must ban them immediately!

#truckControlNow, #knifeControlNow, #bombControlNow, etc

— Foxy 🦃🍷🏈 (@FoxyConservativ) November 6, 2017

“deadly mass killing machines.” Like trucks?

— Bill McLaughlin (@whydoIcare8) November 6, 2017

You mean like pressure cookers, vans, cars, fertilizer, chlorine, poisons, fireworks, private planes, swords, gasoline, microwaves?

— Keith Barrett (@KeithBarrett) November 6, 2017

Seriously. We need to ban bombs. #BombControlNow.

Also, this is the dumbest tweet ever:

Imagine if people protested against seatbelts because they wouldn’t save every passenger in every car accident so therefore argued they were pointless….#GunControlNow

— Sally Kohn (@sallykohn) November 6, 2017

Um…we have a Constitutionally protected right to own guns. That’s the difference here.

Imagine if seatbelts were a constitutionally protected right. But, they’re not are they? #gunsense #lowIQ #LiberalsAreStupid #statist

— LearnedJDP (@TheLearnedJDP) November 6, 2017

That’s what debating with a liberal looks like. They’re hopelessly confused.

h/t Twitchy