

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA OMG LOOK DONNA BRAZILE EXPLAINING KAMALA.
.@donnabrazile: @VP Harris "is probably one of the most undefined human beings. She is incredible. She’s standing in her own power … So, while her poll numbers may not reflect her true popularity, I can guarantee you Kamala Harris will not be replaced on the party’s ticket." pic.twitter.com/5J2UAoXIs1
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) February 13, 2023
What does it even mean to “stand in your own power?” THAT DOESN’T MEAN ANYTHING. Which is actually kind of perfect when you think about it, because Kamala herself CONSTANTLY says tons of words that mean absolutely nothing.
She’s “undefined,” you guys. Don’t you see? All of these silly polls that suggest Americans recognize Kamala for the empty suit she is simply “don’t reflect her true popularity.” Um…WHAT?!?!?! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL K.
Now, I don’t think Joe will choose someone other than Kamala if in fact he finally announces he’s running for re-election. But if he doesn’t run? She’s gonna face some serious competition, and she will absolutely not be the nominee.
Do y’all think he’s gonna run? Discuss.
7 Comments
The Dems will have trouble trying to kick the “undefined” (and unqualified) Kamala Harris to the curb. She’s in baby, whether they like it or not. She’s “black” and she’s a defined woman. The only boxes she doesn’t check are LBGTQ or disabled. If the Dems do not replace Kamala with an actually qualified black woman, they will have to cheat even more to win in 2024.
And Donna Brazille is one of the worst political hacks ever.
Given that that side of the political spectrum can’t define “woman”, I’m not at all surprised that they can’t define “Kamala” either.
“Undefined” is polite euphemism to describe someone at the podium who makes absolutely no sense.
So Kamala Harris is null? That’s what undefined means.
Though Kurt is correct, I don’t think those powers behind the throne will allow him to run again; he’s too out of it for them to even pretend he’s the one in charge, and that lets people see too much of the truth for them to be comfortable.
If “Dr” Jill doesn’t allow him to willingly step out of the way, they’ll arrange a nice little accident for him before the primaries get under way.
I doubt Joe will run, mostly because he really didn’t run before. The media ran for him and kept him out of the spotlight. People have now seen Joe and he’s no longer such an unknown quantity and I don’t think he’s showing as much of the centrist figure that he was presented as in 2020. This isn’t even factoring in his almost constant “gaffes”
Ultimately I think the deciding factor is how much influence Democrats will have on who is the Republican choice as they did in 2016 in seeing if there is anyone they can manage to promote enough in the primary and smear later so their guy can come out victorious.
“Do y’all think he’s gonna run?”
We had a soft coup in 2020. So now, just like all the Presidential decisions, where he runs again or not is not his decision to make. That decision will be made by the unelected people who actually run things.
Not “where he runs again . . .”. It should have been “Whether he runs again”.
The comments need an edit button for those of us who are speling and writing challenged.